| In
response to costs that have doubled in the last five years,
the University will undertake a two-part plan to slow the
rate of increase of its expenditures for employee health
insurance, Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic
Affairs Paul N. Courant told the Board
of Regents today (April 17). The current budget pressures
facing the University have increased the urgency for addressing
the rapid growth in health insurance costs, he said.
In
a preliminary measure, the University will require most
employees and retirees to pay a share of the cost of health
insurance premiums, beginning Jan. 1, 2004, Courant told
regents. At present, 70 percent of employees and retirees,
including virtually everyone with individual coverage, pay
no co-premium, he said.
To
create a longer-term solution, a committee
of faculty and staff, appointed by Courant, will begin
work immediately to examine the best way to determine University
and employee contributions for health insurance on an ongoing
basis.
Courant
presented regents with a number of statistics to provide
context for the magnitude of the expense. The combined amount
paid by the University and employees toward health insurance
premiums is estimated at $184 million in fiscal year 2003
(FY03), up 17 percent from the prior year and double the
figures for 1998 ($92 million). In that same period, the
share assumed by the University increased from 92 percent
to 94 percent of the total.
“It
has been 15 years since the University took a comprehensive
look at the way it determines the employee portion of health
care premiums,” Courant said. “The formulas
have not been changed in response to major changes in healthcare
trends, including the growth of managed care, nor have they
been adjusted in light of data about the University’s
actual experience.” For example, when the current
formulas were adopted, HMOs were relatively new offerings,
and only a small portion of faculty and staff enrolled in
them. Now, they are the most popular type of plan, Courant
said.
“The
wider payment of co-premiums will not stop the increases
in cost to the University; it will only slow them down,”
Courant said. “Even after most employees begin to
pay a co-premium, the cost to the University for providing
health insurance probably will increase by about 13 percent
in 2004.”
The committee’s primary work is to design a comprehensive,
rational structure that determines University and employee
premium-sharing and that is financially responsible, competitive
in the marketplace and responsive to the needs of faculty
and staff, Courant said.
The
committee will also consider structures used by other universities
and businesses---such as a fourth tier that would cover
households that consist of one adult with any number of
children. A fourth tier would recognize that costs are lower
for this configuration than for households of two adults,
or of two adults with children.
“I
want to emphasize that these actions---both the short-term
change and the longer-term recommendations of the committee---are
not intended to diminish the number or quality range of
the health plans offered by the University,” Courant
told regents. “They [the offerings] are very important
to the health and welfare of our faculty and staff and their
families, and are important aspects of our ability to recruit
and retain the highest quality workforce.”
The
committee will report its findings and recommendations in
Sept. 2003, followed by a period for campus discussion.
Final decisions are slated for the end of the Fall 2003
semester, with implementation as soon as possible.
|
How
benefit changes will affect employees |
In
2004, almost all employees who now pay nothing toward
their health insurance premiums will pay a 5 percent
co-premium, and the University will pay the remaining
95 percent. Employees who now pay a co-premium most
likely will see no change in the proportion of the
contribution they make toward their insurance premium.
As always, if rates increase, both University and
employee will see a dollar increase in their contributions
(see chart 4 below).
The
recommendations of the committee regarding co-premiums
will take effect in 2005 and will supersede the 2004
arrangement.
The more immediate change will not affect all staff
at once because of existing collective bargaining
agreements, some of which have specific provisions
governing co-premiums. In general, when changes such
as these are enacted for non-represented staff, the
University negotiates to incorporate similar changes
during future contract talks.
In
addition to the change in co-premiums, the University
will eliminate a $6 per month flex credit that was
initiated in 1995 when U-M went to a flexible benefits
system. The Flex credit was intended to share savings
that resulted from going to the new program, but it
has more than paid back any savings to employees.
|
|