| |
Special Series: Habitat Conservation Planning
Where Property Rights and Biodiversity Converge
Part I: Conservation Planning at the Regional Scale
Gregory A. Thomas Natural Heritage Institute, 2140 Shattuck
Ave., 5th Floor, Berkeley, CA 94704; gat@n-h-i.org
Abstract
In the tension between property rights and the public interest
in protecting remnant habitats resides the most daunting challenges that
our national program to protect biodiversity will face in the next era.
Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) provide a mechanism to address these
con-flicts. The number of HCPs has increased dramatically in recent years
leading to considerable scrutiny of this tool by conservation biologists
and environmental organizations. This paper distills the many critical
reviews and recommendations for reform of this process. It reveals that
HCPs that approach conservation at a bioregional scale can better address
the needs of both imperiled species and property owners than can single
species, single landowner plans. Bioregional conservation planning can
potentially lead to several benefits, including: more equitable apportionment
of the costs of conservation, fostering species recovery, facilitating
adaptive management, strengthening public participation, and capturing
economies of scale for high-caliber science. Multi-species plans undertaken
by county or state governments can be a step in this direction. Recovery
plans and programmatic conservation standards could be up-graded to also
serve as vehicles for establishing bioregional conservation goals as a
template for individual HCPs. All of these strategies will require a more
proactive involvement of federal agencies to assist in conservation science
and planning and in managing public lands to foster recovery of imperiled
species.
Would you like to get the full article? |
|
|