The crucial ranking of graduate school
departments, so vital to the University's standing as
a research giant, gives a mixed result. The
behavioral sciences continue to be the strongest
area. Political science came in second only to
Harvard, and represented the only subject in which
Michigan outranked Berkeley (U-M 2; Cal 3).
The bad news is that in vital subjects such as
physics, chemistry and biology, Michigan just does
not measure up to the quality expected of a
university which aspires to world-class research
status. Michigan outscores the mediocre schools;
it falls short when compared to the super powers.
The real disaster, however, is the undergraduate
ranking, even though in the first column---academic
reputation---Michigan is tied for 8th with five other
schools. As far as the other parameters, Michigan's
performance on SAT scores is unimpressive to say the
least. Not only do a number of private schools outdo
it, but so does the University of Virginia.
Does Michigan have the clout to lure full
professors from the Harvards and Stanfords and Cals?
Does it have the status to keep them from luring away
its full professors? The University can attract an
associate professor from anywhere, promote him or her
to full professor, and then feel self-important until
that scholar accomplishes something terrific and then
gets a call from Harvard or Cal or Stanford or some
similar school, and leaves Ann Arbor, and never looks
back. Michigan seems, alas, to have become a kind of
Triple-A farm team for the Major Leagues of academe.