| Environmental Community | Regulated Community |
| Little funding for plans and "no surprises" | Lack of certainty |
| "Jeopardy" too weak a standard | Unreasonable costs |
| Few public participation opportunities | Imbalanced allocation of costs |
| Ineffective management provisions | Agreements not reliable |
| Poor oversight of plan implementation | Science lacks rigor |
| Small ownerships lead to fragmentation | Planning process not predictable |
| Species focus too narrow | Implementing not streamlined |
| Lack of credible scientific input | Not enough public funding |
Archives | Bulletin Board | Comments | Contribute to the ESU | ESU Staff | Home | Jan/Feb 1997 Contents | Links | Next Issue | Return to Article | Subscriptions