


Geologists are fairly certain that the beds of organic remains mixed with silt and mud to form layers. Over time, mineral sedimentation formed on top of the organisms, effectively entombing them in rock. As this occurred, pressure and temperature increased. These conditions, and possibly other unknown factors, caused organic material to break down into the simpler form of hydrocarbons: chains of carbon and hydrogen ranging from simple configuration to complex compounds. Another affect of extreme pressure is that the oil and gas which are various mixtures of hydrocarbons, migrate upwards to the surface. Exactly when in the conversion process and the nature of this migration is not known and is subject to conjecture.
Oil
and gas are found in the ground, not freely drifting up through the earth.
This is because the hydrocarbons come across rock formations that they
are unable to penetrate. Complex rock structures that effectively trap
gas and oil are formed by tectonic plate activity, the same forces that
shift continents. The most common formation that accomplishes this is called
an anticline, a dome or arched layer of rock that is impermeable by oil
and gas. Underneath this barrier, a reservoir builds up. An oil reservoir
is not some vast underground lake, but rather a seemingly solid layer of
rock that is porous. Oil fields have been found everywhere on the planet
except for the continent of Antarctica.
These fields always contain some gas, but this natural gas, methane, does not take nearly as long to form. Natural gas is also found in independent deposits within the ground as well as from others sources too. Methane is a common gas found in swamps and is also the byproduct of animals' digestive system. Incidentally, Methane is also a greenhouse gas.
Coal is formed in a similar to the other fossil fuels, though it goes through a different process, coalification. Coal is made of decomposed plant matter in conditions of high temperature and pressure, though it takes a relatively shorter amount of time to form. Coal is not a uniform substance either, it's composition varies from deposit to deposit. Factors that cause this deviation are the types of original plant matter, and the extent the plant matter decomposed. There are over 1200 distinguishable types of coal. Coal begins as peat, a mass of dead and decomposing plant matter. Peat itself has been used as fuel in the past, as an alternative to wood. Next, the peat becomes lignite, a brownish rock that contains recognizable plant matter and has a relatively low heating value. Lignite is the halfway point from peat to coal. The next phase is subbituminous. A shade of dull black, showing very little plant matter, this type of coal has a less than ideal heating value. Bituminous coal is jet black, very dense, and brittle. This type of coal has high heating value.
The main point of this is that all of these fossil fuels are made of hydrocarbons. It may come as a surprise that these two elements, hydrogen and carbon, can create many, many different compounds with unique characteristics. What makes hydrocarbons valuable to our society is the stored energy stored within them. This energy is contained in the atomic bonds. The original source of this energy is all the solar energy the prehistoric organisms trapped in their bodies eons ago. How do we make use of this bond energy then? We burn them.
Early oil explorers relied heavily on intuition and guesswork to find the precious 'black gold.' These daring entrepreneurs were known as 'wildcatters.' A fabled technique used by the wildcatters is the 'old hat.' They would basically toss their hat up in the air and wherever it landed, they drilled. When the wildcatters got lucky, and struck oil, it would typically gush up the drill pipe, hence, a gusher. Because gushers are a safety hazard and environmental concern, oil companies today contain them. After discovering an oil field, it is the task of the oil company's engineers and technicians to get it out. Not all oil fields turn out to be gushers and even the ones that are eventually loose pressure, leaving a lot of untapped fossil fuel resource in the reservoir. Even with modern extraction techniques, 100% of the oil in any given field is still not yet recoverable.
One
thing an oil company does to facilitate the extraction process is setting
up what is known as a 'Christmas tree,' a system of valves and pipes that
regulate oil flow and pressure. Another system used in much smaller reservoirs
not worth the expense of manning with technicians is the setup of a beam
pump These are also known as 'nodding donkeys;' they extract oil from small
oil pools that do not contain much resource. In large oil fields, techniques
such as water and gas injection are employed to maximize return of the
investment. By pumping water and gas into the wells, the pressure increases
allowing oil to flow upwards once more Large oil fields can be found under
the sea floor as well. To exploit these fields, vast oil drilling stations,
which are marvels of modern engineering, tap into these underwater deposits
and bring them to the surface.
Although fossil fuels have been around long before humans even discovered fire, our prehistoric ancestors had no use for them. In the late 1800's, coal and gas were used as heat and light sources, steam locomotives as well. There were early automobiles too, but these vehicles were more of a novelty than a way of life. It wasn't until the 1940's did things change. Why the 1940's? The answer is that engineers and inventors had government support and extra incentive to develop fossil fuel technologies, war. World War II was the catalyst and not World War I because 'The War to End All Wars' was fought by men in trenches and mechanized warfare had only been developed late in the conflict. World War II had the German Blitzkrieg, or 'Lightning War.' This tactic utilized Shtuka dive bombers and Panzer tanks; German engineers enabled this, and was eventually countered by Allied technological advancements. From then on, usage and development of fossil fuels steadily rose.
The
primary refining technique used to separate hydrocarbons and provide the
ingredients for modern fuels is called fractional distillation. Hydrocarbons
of different size and configuration usually have differences in boiling
points that are large enough to use as a method of separation. By vaporizing
them, they tend to float upwards until the hydrocarbons condense, which
is where they are collected. Hydrocarbons as simple as butane and alcohols
with few carbons are sorted along with more complex ones such as aromatics
with 9 carbons. The fuels we commonly use today are a mixture of these
hydrocarbons distilled from the petroleum extracted from the earth.
2. Fast acceleration
3. Low occurrence of stalling
4. Relatively quiet and low tendency to knock
5. Good combustion efficiency
Turbo-jet fuel was first developed in WWII for use in airplane engines. Because of constraints on petroleum products, namely gasoline for tanks and other ground vehicles, this fuel was designed to make use of compounds not vital to gasoline production whenever possible. The result was a highly volatile fuel that led to many accidents in handling. Modern aviation fuel is still more volatile than gasoline, though it has become much safer than it previously was.
Diesel fuel and domestic heating oil are similar in composition. Domestic heating oils are not widely used in the US, though they still have limited application in underdeveloped countries. Diesel fuels are used frequently in the world today; transport vehicles such as trains, boats, trucks, and busses use diesel fuel.
Fuel oils are mainly residuals from the fractional distillation process. They are more or less the leftovers from production of other fuels. They have been and are still used in power generation plants. Because of the low quality and high pollution content fuel oils are being used less often.
Of the fuels previously listed, gasoline, turbo-jet fuel, and diesel fuel were designed for usage in engines. A fairly good, simple definition of an engine is a device that converts chemical or heat energy into mechanical energy. Engines convert fossil fuel energy into a form that we can more readily use.

·
Intake-- Intake valve opesns allowing fuel/air mixture into the cylinder
· Compression-- The piston rises, reducing volume and increasing pressure
· Expansion (power stroke)-- Spark plug ignites, fuel expands pushing piston
· Exhaust-- Exhaust valve opens expelling spent fuel from cylinder
The
second type of engine is known as a 2-stroke engine. These are usually
placed in lawn mowers, outboard motors, and high performance recreational
vehicles. There are two main differences between 4 and 2-stroke engines
A 4-stroke engine causes two revolutions in one cycle whereas the 2-stroke
only takes one revolution to complete its cycle. The other major difference
between them is that 2-strokes require a gasoline/oil mixture as fuel.
This is because the cylinder must be kept completely bathed in lubricants
to prevent damage. Due to these attributes, these engines are much more
compact and can generate higher revolutions per minutes and more acceleration.
The problem with this design is that it is not at all fuel efficient and
burning motor oil causes a lot of pollution.
Diesel engines, as you might know, require no spark plugs in the combustion process. Otherwise, the design of the diesel engine is not much different than an Otto-cycle engine. Instead of spark plugs, the diesel engine relies on compression and the heating of air in the fuel mixture to cause ignition. To achieve this, diesel fuel has a lower boiling point and does not require much heat. Diesel fuel is cheaper to make than gasoline, though its high level of pollutants require it to undergo further filtration; this drives the fuel price up.
The last type of conventional engine discussed here is the wankel rotary combustion engine, named after its inventor, Felix Wankel. Out of the engines discussed, this one is the most 'revolutionary' (excuse the pun). The wankel engine does not use pistons, instead it uses a rotor. The rotor spins and drives the shaft by expanding fuel in the housing on the sides of the rotor. The results of this engine type are as follows:
· Smooth: no reciprocating motion
· Extended power stroke rotation: 270 degrees vs. 180 degrees of a piston
· Fewer moving parts
· Cooler combustion means fewer oxides of nitrogen
Aviation fuel, the turbo-jet fuel, is used by both jet
and propeller aircraft today. Prop engines are designed similar to the
4-stroke engines of cars, though the demands on these two varieties of
engines are quite different.
To
accommodate this, prop engines are much larger and have higher power output.
The distillate fuel they use is ideal for this purpose. With the inception
of jet propulsion the fuels used did not change all that much. Even though
it may seem that the jet engine is very different, it is still considered
to be an internal combustion engine. The main components of a jet engine
are the compressor, combustion chamber, and the turbine. Air flows into
the compressor where it is pressurized and forced into the combustion chamber
There, inside the chamber, fuel is constantly flowing in, and ignited causing
an expansion of the fuel The turbine's purpose is to provide enough energy
from the expelled gasses to the compressor in order to operate at peak
performance. Jet engine technology has advanced greatly and there are many
different types of them. Just to list a few, there are turbojet, turbofan,
turboprop, turboshaft, and ramjet designs. Each have specialized uses,
mostly in aviation technology.
How we get electrical energy from coal is by means of coal power plants. These power plants first combust the coal in large furnaces creating tremendous amounts of heat. This heat is used to evaporate water in boilers so they convert to steam. The steam expands, causing pressure to increase in the boiler. A steam turbine is placed at the exit of the boiler where it converts energy from the moving steam into mechanical energy. The rotation of this turbine is used to spin a magnet inside a power generator. This generator is a large electromagnet that encases the spinning magnet. Instead of putting electricity into the electromagnet to cause the coil to magnetize, electrons are captured from the spinning magnet and collected. The electrons are then sent to the national power grid where they are distributed as needed.




The term reserves means the amounts yet to produce from known discoveried resources as of today, however it is difficult to estimate the actual amount. The country with the most reserves is Saudia Arabia with 189 Gb. This is followed by the former Soviet Union with 84 Gb. Note that the whole Middle East region has more than half of the world's oil reserves with 439 of the possible 800 billion barrels in the world.


Discovered to date is the sum of the cumulative production and the reserves. Again, see that the Middle East Gulf is in first place with 625 Gb followed by Eurasia, 267 Gb, and North America, 225 Gb. For singular countries, the order holds true with Saudi Arabia in first with the former Soviet Union and the United States rounding out the top three.


The ultimate is cumulative production when production ends. It is important to realize that there is an ultimate even if it is difficult to determine the number exactly. The Middle East region has the largest endowment with 687 Gb, followed by Eurasia with 295 Gb, and North America with 238 Gb. Saudi Arabia, 280 Gb, the FSU 230 Gb, and the United States, 210 Gb, are the three most richly endowed countries.


The undiscovered is the ultimate less the discovered. In terms of individual counrtires, the former Soviet Union (21 Gb), Iraq (19 Gb), Iran (17 Gb), and Saudi Arabia (16 Gb) have the greatest promise. Discovery rates have been falling with it currently standing at about 7 Gb a year. Most of what remains will likely be found within 10-20 years.


The remaining is the reserves plus the undiscovered. The middle east gulf continues to dominate with about half of the total, followed by Eurasia, and Latin America.

Now it is important to see which countries are close to running out of oil. This graph shows how close some countries are to the midpoint of what they can produce.
Note that Saudi Arabia produces the same as the US. The US needs 600,000 wells for its production and Saudi Arabia, only 860 wells. This is because the US sits on an old oil field while Saudi Arabia is located over a very young and rich one.
| Resource | Description Of Injury | Status Of Recovery | Comments / Discussion | |||
| Oil Spill Morality (est.) | Measured Decline | Sublethal / Chronic Effects | Current Population Status | Continuing Effects | ||
| MARINE ANIMALS | ||||||
| Harbor Seals | Yes
(300) |
Yes | Yes | Stable | Unknown | Many seals were directly oiled. There was a greater decline in population in oiled vs. unoiled areas in 1989 and 1990. Population was in decline prior to the spill and recovery has still not begun possibly due to lack of preferred diet. Current population decline is 6% per year. |
| Killer Whales | Yes
(13) |
Yes | Unknown | Deteriorating | Unknown | 13 adult whales of the AB pod were missing and presumed dead in 1990 and no young were produced in 1990 or 1991. The pod gained 4 members in the following two years but since then there have been more losses than births. Some experts think that the loss of 13 whales is not related to the spill. |
| Sea Lions | Unknown | Yes | No | Continuing Decline | No | Several sea lions were observed with oiled pelts and oil residues were found in some tissues. It was not possible to determine population effects or cause of death of carcasses recovered. Sea lions were already in decline prior to the spill. |
| Sea Otters | Yes
(3,500 to 5,500) |
Yes | Yes | Stable | Yes,
Possibly |
Survival differences between oiled and unoiled areas have been noticed since the spill. Sea Otters feed in the lower intertidal zones and may still be effected by hydrocarbons in the environment. |
| TERRESTRIAL MAMMALS | ||||||
| River Otter | Yes
(total unknown) |
No | Yes,
Possibly |
Unknown | Unknown | Exposure to hydrocarbons and possible sublethal effects were determined, but no effects were established on population. In 1991 studies showed that exposure to hydrocarbons still remained probably from exposure through diet. |
| BIRDS | ||||||
| Bald Eagle | Yes
(200 or more) |
No | Yes | Recovered | No | Productivity was disrupted in 1989 but returned to normal in 1990. Exposure to hydrocarbons was found in 1989 and it is assumed that the source, based on visual observation, was from eating oiled carcasses. |
| Black Oyster-
catchers |
Yes
(120 to 150 adults) |
Yes | Yes | Recovering | Yes | Differences in egg sizes between oiled and unoiled areas were found in 1989. Populations declined more in oiled areas during 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992. Possibly due to exposure to hydrocarbons through diet. |
| Common Murres | Yes
(170,000 to 300,000) |
Yes | Yes | Varies | Yes | Measurable impacts on population were recorded in 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992. Breeding is still reduced in some areas of the Gulf Of Alaska. |
| Harlequin Ducks | Yes
(approx. 1,000) |
Yes | Yes,
Possibly |
Unknown | Yes | Population declines lasted through 1992 partially due to reproductive failure. Currently studies are focusing on differences on winter survival rates between western and eastern Prince William Sound |
| Marbled Murrelets | Yes
(8,000 to 12,000) |
Yes | No | Continuing Decline | Unknown | Marbled murrelets experienced a 7% population decline due to the spill. Measurable population decline was also observed before the spill and continuing today. |
| Pigeon Guillemonts | Yes (1,500 to 3,000) | Yes | No | No | Unknown | Populations were in decline before the spill. The spill claimed between 10 and 15 percent of the population throughout the region. Hydrocarbon contamination is assumed based on the finding of hydrocarbons on the exterior of their eggs. |
| FISH | ||||||
| Pacific Herring | Yes,
To Eggs & Larva |
Yes | Yes | See Comments | No | Measurable egg counts between oiled and unoiled areas were found in 1989 and 1990. In 1989, 1990, 1991 lethal and subleathal effects on eggs and larvae were found. In 1993 the population crashed due to a viral disease and fungus. Commercial fishing seasons were closed for four years between 1993 and 1997. |
| Pink Salmon | Yes,
to eggs |
Yes | Yes | See Comments | No | Severe effects were inflicted on fry in 1989 and 1990 and continued to be high in 1991 and 1992. Fishing seasons were closed in 1989. Wide swings in returns have been documented but are more likely due to natural causes. The SEA ecosystem project is currently studying these swings. |
| HUMAN RESOURCES & SERVICES | ||||||
| Resource | Description of Injury | Status | ||||
| Commercial Fishing | During 1989 emergency fishing closures were ordered in Prince William Sound, Cook Inlet, Kodiak and the Alaska Peninsula. This affected salmon, herring, crab, shrimp, rockfish, and sablefish. The 1989 closures resulted in over-escapement in the Kenai River and in the Red Lake system. Limited closures were also in effect in 1990. | Low adult sockeye returns in 1994 were a result of the over-escapement from Kenai River. Future fishing seasons may need to be closed to balance out the problem. | ||||
| Recreation & Tourism | Some commercial recreation and tourism businesses were injured by the reduction in visitor spending as a result of the spill. Non-commercial recreation also decreased in some parts of the spill area. The quality of recreational experiences also decreased due to crowding, residual oil, and fewer fish and wildlife | Recreational users are benefiting from restoration projects in several ways. Habitat protection opens up land previously off limits to campers, hunters, sport fishers, and wildlife viewers while at the same time protecting the health of fish, bird and marine populations. In 1996 a 220-acre Cook Inlet bluff parcel was purchased and will be turned into a state-run campground and recreational facility. Money from the Exxon Settlement is also being used to build campgrounds, cabins, trails, bridges, buoys, food cages, fire rings, docks and interpretive signs. | ||||
Natural gas accounts for 24% of the energy in the United States. Domestic production of natural gas peaked in 1973; this is because we do not import due to safety problems. Consumption of natural gas is actually flat as oppsed to increasing usage of coal and oil.
Coal
Petroleum / Natural Gas will run out in the next 50 years. 97% of fossil fuel reserves are coal. 20% of the world's coal supply is located in the United States.

Shale oil deposits in the US are found in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, and western Colorado. Oil shale contains kerogen which, when burned, can be converted into fuel products. The amount of shale oil deposits are significantly greater than the amount of US petroleum deposits by a factor of ten. However, economic mining requires a yield of 25 gallons of oil per ton of shale. Only 30% of the known deposits meet this criteria. Of that 30%, only 15% is recoverable under present conditions. The refinement of shale is very difficult and requires large amounts of water. The bottom line is that shale oil is not economically viable at this point.
So what are our options? Alternative forms of energy are currently under development even though most of them are only in their inital stages. With increased government and public support, we may be able to speed up the development of these technologies and help free ourselves from the usage of fossil fuels. Oil companies will have to be dealt with because with the future shortages of fossil fuels, they would stand to reap enormous profits. To prevent this, oil and other energy resource providing companies should be encouraged to develop these technologies for the sake of ethics if not for long-term profit gains when all fossil fuel resources are exhausted. Here are some alternative, renewable sources of energy in various stages of development:
Nuclear Fusion: Fusion involves the extraction of "heavy" hydrogen (duterium) from water and the combination of two hydrogen atoms to form helium. Although it has long been hailed as the path to unlimited energy, scientific feasibility has yet to be established. Demonstrations of technological feasibility must then follow, with mastery of materials development and system engineering looming as major hurdles.
Hydrogen: Hydrogen may become the "energy carrier of the future." Most schemes for generating hydrogen are based on the splitting of water using solar energy directly, or indirectly via electricity. Hydrogen would then be used as a substitute for natural gas. Although the technical feasibility of water splitting on a large scale has yet to be established, a "hydrogen economy" remains at least a distant possibility.
Solar Satellites: Collecting solar energy in space and transmitting it to earth via microwave is another long-range possibility. Due to the large size of the required collector, current launch and deployment costs render this scheme economically infeasible. However, future advances in space equipment may change this assessment.
Energy Plants: Rapid improvements in bioengineering may provide the basis for improving the efficency or redirecting the end products of photosynthetic processes to produce commercial fuels such as hydrogen. At this time, scientific feasibility of developing "super species" remains to be established.
Combinations: Concepts for combining end uses and supply generation facilities to better utilize waste heat already are being employed. These include cogeneraton of steam and electricity and district heating. Future combinations may include the use of nuclear energy to generate heat for coal gasification and liquification. The requisite hydrogen for synthetic fuel production may be provided by splitting water with solar energy. Other hybrid systems may emerge as the component parts become practical.
With these options we can help phase out our dependency on fossil fuels and find clean, efficent, sources of power. Keep in mind that these are not the only options known today and that there are others that have not even been conceived. Using these other sources, we can guarantee a healthy and prosperous future.
coal n, often attrib [ME col, fr. OE; akin to OHG & ON kol burning ember, MIr gual coal] (bef. 12c) 1: a piece of glowing carbon or charred wood: ember 2: charcoal 1 3 a: a black or brownish black solid combustible substance formed by the partial decomposition of vegetable matter without free access of air and under the influence of moisture and often increased pressure and temperature that is widely used as a natural fuel b pl, Brit: pieces or a quantity of the fuel broken up for burningcoal vt (1602) 1: to burn to charcoal: char 2: to supply with coal ~ vi: to take in coal
oil n, often attrib [ME oile, fr. OF, fr. L oleum olive oil, fr. Gk elaion, fr. elaia olive] (13c) 1 a: any of numerous unctuous combustible substances that are liquid or can be liquefied easily on warming, are soluble in ether but not in water, and leave a greasy stain on paper or cloth b (1): petroleum (2): the petroleum industry 2: a substance (as a cosmetic preparation) of oily consistency <bath ~> 3 a: an oil color used by an artist b: a painting done in oil colors 4: unctuous or flattering speechoil vt (15c): to smear, rub over, furnish, or lubricate with oil ~ vi: to take on fuel oil -- oil the hand or oil the palm: bribe, tip
zoo.plank.ton n (1901): plankton composed of animals -- zoo.plank.ton.ic adj
phy.to.plank.ton n [ISV] (1897): planktonic plant life -- phy.to.plank.ton.ic adj
internal combustion engine n (1884): a heat engine in which the combustion that generates the heat takes place inside the engine proper instead of in a furnace
Wan.kel engine n [Felix Wankel d. 1988 Ger. engineer] (1961): an internal combustion rotary engine that has a rounded triangular rotor functioning as a piston and rotating in a space in the engine and that has only two major moving parts
en.gine n [ME engin, fr. MF, fr. L ingenium natural disposition, talent, fr. in- + gignere to beget--more at kin] (13c) 1 obs a: ingenuity b: evil contrivance: wile 2: something used to effect a purpose: agent, instrument <mournful and terrible ~ of horror and of crime --E. A. Poe> 3 a: a mechanical tool: as (1): an instrument or machine of war (2) obs: a torture implement b: machinery c: any of various mechanical appliances--often used in combination <fire ~> 4: a machine for converting any of various forms of energy into mechanical force and motion; also: a mechanism or object that serves as an energy source <black holes may be the ~s for quasars> 5: a railroad locomotiveengine vt en.gined; en.gin.ing (1868): to equip with engines
tur.bine n [F, fr. L turbin-, turbo top, whirlwind, whirl, fr. turba confusion--more at turbid] (1842): a rotary engine actuated by the reaction or impulse or both of a current of fluid (as water, steam, or air) subject to pressure and usu. made with a series of curved vanes on a central rotating spindle
hy.dro.car.bon n (1826): an organic compound (as acetylene or butane) containing only carbon and hydrogen and often occurring in petroleum, natural gas, coal, and bitumens
residual oil n (ca. 1948): fuel oil that remains after the removal of valuable distillates (as gasoline) from petroleum and that is used esp. by industry--called also resid
dis.til.late n (ca. 1859) 1: a liquid product condensed from vapor during distillation 2: something concentrated or extracted as if by distilling
sub.bi.tu.mi.nous adj (1908): of, relating to, or being coal of lower rank than bituminous coal but higher than lignite
bituminous coal n (1879): a coal that when heated yields considerable volatile bituminous matter--called also soft coal
pet.ro.chem.i.cal n (1942): a chemical isolated or derived from petroleum or natural gas -- pet.ro.chem.is.try n
lig.nite n [F, fr. L lignum] (ca. 1808): a usu. brownish black coal intermediate between peat and bituminous coal; esp: one in which the texture of the original wood is distinct--called also brown coal -- lig.nit.ic adj
an.thra.cite n [Gk anthrakitis, fr. anthrak-, anthrax coal] (1812): a hard natural coal of high luster differing from bituminous coal in containing little volatile matter and in burning very cleanly--called also hard coal -- an.thra.cit.ic adj
(Definitions are taken from Britannica Online http://www.eb.com)

