COMMUNITY IN CONSERVATION
AFRICA
WILDLIFE
Abel, N
and P Blaikie (1986). “Elephants, people, parks and development: the case of
the Luangwa Valley, Zambia.” Environmental Management 10(6): 735-751.
Akama,
J (1996). “Western environmental values and nature-based tourism in Kenya.” Tourism
Management 17(8): 567-574.
Kenya is one of the leading
tourist destinations in Africa. Most of the country's tourism is based on
nature attractions. About 10% of the country has been set aside for wildlife
conservation and the promotion of nature-based tourism. This study gives a
historical evaluation of western environmental values and how these values
influence wildlife conservation and the development of nature-based tourism in
Kenya. Also, a comparative analysis is conducted between western environmental
values and rural peasants' environmental perceptions. (Source)
Akama,
J, C Lant, et al. (1995). “Conflicting attitudes toward state wildlife
conservation programs in Kenya.” Society & Natural Resources 8(2):
133-144.
We present a case study of the
social issues of wildlife conservation in Kenya based on field work in and near
Nairobi and Tsavo National Parks. Surveys of small-scale cultivators and
pastoralists (157) and local park officials (44) reveal that there are
widespread negative feelings and perceptions of local people toward state
policies and programs of wildlife conservation. For instance, 84% of the local
people reported that there is a bad relationship between the national park
management and the local community; only 10% stated that the park is an asset
to them; and 57% asserted that the park should be abolished. Moreover,
perceptions and attitudes of local people and park officials are greatly
disparate with regard to the benefits the parks provide for local people, the
level of conflict between local people and wildlife, and the future of the
parks. (Authors)
Akama,
J, C Lant, et al. (1996). “A political-ecology approach to wildlife
conservation in Kenya.” Environmental Values 5(4): 335-347.
Kenya has one of the highest
remaining concentrations of tropical savanna wildlife in the world. It has been
recognised by the state and international community as a 'unique world
heritage' which should be preserved for posterity. However, the wildlife
conservation efforts of the Kenya government confront complex and often
persistent social and ecological problems, including land-use conflicts between
the local people and wildlife, local people's suspicions and hostilities toward
state policies of wildlife conservation, and accelerated destruction of
wildlife habitats. This essay uses a political-ecological framework in the
analysis of the social factors of wildlife conservation in Kenya. It postulates
that the overriding socioeconomic issue impacting wildlife conservation in
Kenya is underdevelopment. The problem of underdevelopment is manifested in
forms of increasing levels of poverty, famine and malnutrition. The long term
survival of Kenya's wildlife depends on social and ecological solutions to the
problems of underdevelopment. (Author)
Arhem,
K (1984). “Two sides of development: Maasai pastoralism and wildlife
conservation in Ngorongoro, Tanzania.” Ethnos 49(3-4): 186-210.
Balakrishnan,
M and DE Ndhlovu (1992). “Wildlife utilization and local people: a case-study
in upper Lupande game management area, Zambia.” Environmental Conservation
19(2): 135-144.
Wildlife culling is the most
preferred form of wildlife utilization in ULGMA. Nevertheless, die frequency of
game-meat consumption by local people is low, partly due to the problem of
irregular meat sales from the culling scheme and partly due to the low
purchasing capability of villagers. LIRDP needs to improve the distribution
routine of meat sale at lower prices if the culling scheme is to fulfil its
objective of providing game-meat to local people. It is also essential to
spread comprehension of the use of benefits from wildlife utilization among the
local residents. Any increase in the allocation of the wildlife harvest quota
should be considered with caution in order that species are not harvested at a
rate beyond their reproductive capacity. There is resentment against safari
hunting, based on the opinion that it gives to foreigners the opportunities to
utilize wildlife resources while the local people are forbidden access to them.
Appreciation of benefits from safari hunting is minimal, and option for
reduction of the off-take allocation quota is strong. Although safari hunting
is the most prominent revenue-generating form of utilization, benefits from it
are not visible to local communities. Exchange of information between LIRDP and
the local communities concerned with the use of revenue from wildlife
utilization programmes needs to be reinforced. This would be instrumental not
only in minimizing misconceptions about safari hunting, but also in
establishing cooperation between LIRDP and local communities. An increase in
the number that may be taken of the more numerous species during DGL hunting
could well be considered, so as to enable more local people to utilize wildlife
resources legally. Control shooting has
a marginal effect in reducing crop damage. Even though electric fencing could
be an effective barrier against large animals such as Elephants, it would be better
to encourage traditional methods of self-defence. Control shooting is advocated
only if and when the problem gets out of hand. Subsistence poaching is widely
successful, due to the skills of the practitioners, the use of appropriate
traditional technology, and the low operating costs. These features may be
considered favourably in wildlife culling operations. Through allocation of a
sustainable off-take quota to local hunter cooperatives, their services could
be used to provide game-meat to local communities. Continued confrontation with
commercial poachers through regular and more intensive patrols is essential,
particularly in vulnerable areas. LIRDP should maximize the services of Village
Scouts stationed at Miliyoti and Kauluzi wildlife camps by providing adequate
firearms and ammunition for more effective anti-poaching patrols in the game
management areas than currently exist. To gain local support, LIRDP may
consider an increased wildlife off-take quota for the Malaila Kunda traditional
ceremony. This would serve to sustain local culture and would help to develop
enthusiasm among local people for due conservation of animal wildlife and other
natural resources. (Author)
Barnes,
JI (1995). “Economic analysis of community-based wildlife utilisation
initiatives in Botswana.” Development in Southern Africa 12(6): 783-803.
Barrett,
C and P Arcese (1998). “Wildlife harvest in integrated conservation and
development projects: linking harvest to household demand, agricultural
production, and environmental shocks in the Serengeti.” Land Economics
74(4): 449-465.
This paper develops a model
coupling wildlife population dynamics to endogenous human consumption and
poaching behavior in an environment of imperfect labor and product markets and
static agricultural production technology subject to environmental shocks.
Using a model of the Serengeti wildebeest herd, we simulate how long an
integrated conservation and development project based on managed wildlife
harvest might effectively delay biodiversity loss by preempting poaching.
Alternative interventions that more directly tackle the problem of rime-varying
returns to peasant agricultural labor appear to offer more durable solutions to
the challenge of wildlife conservation in the midst of endemic rural poverty.
(SSCI)
Barrett,
CB and P Arcese (1995). “Are integrated conservation and development projects
(ICDPs) sustainable? On the
conservation of large mammals in sub-Saharan Africa.” World Development
23(7): 1073-1084.
Initiatives to link rural
development and species conservation, known as integrated
conservation-development projects (ICDPs), have been launched with considerable
fanfare and funding around the world. Although ICDPs hold appeal as broader
ecological efforts than the conservation and development strategies that
preceded them, they also suffer conceptual flaws that may limit their
appropriateness and potential sustainability, at least when applied to the
protection of large African mammals. (SSCI)
Barrow,
E, P Bergin, et al. (1995). Community conservation lessons from benefit sharing
in east Africa. in Integrating People and Wildlife for a Sustainable Future.
JA Bissonette and PR Krausman, Ed. Bethesda, MD, The Wildlife Society.
Beinart,
W (1990). “Empire, hunting and ecological change in southern and central
Africa.” Past and Present 128: 162-186.
Berger,
D (1993). Wildlife Extension: Participatory Conservation by the Maasai of
Kenya. Nairobi, African Centre for Technology Studies.
Butler,
V (1995). “Is this the way to save Africa's wildlife?: communal Areas
Management Program for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE).” International
Wildlife 25: 38-43.
The Communal Areas Management
Program for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE)
has added a new dimension to wildlife conservation in Zimbabwe. Under
CAMPFIRE, Zimbabwean communities sell hunting or photographic
concessions to safari companies, thus
making wildlife more valuable to local people
and minimizing the inclination toward poaching. While the idea of promoting hunting to help save wildlife may seem ironic, the
program seems to be working. Careful monitoring under CAMPFIRE has helped
ensure that hunted populations remain
stable or increase, and in many villages, the
money acquired through the program goes toward beneficial community projects.
The program has sparked interest throughout the continent, and conservationists from many African nations
have come to Zimbabwe to examine the
program. (Wilsonweb)
Child,
B (1988). The role of wildlife utilization in the sustainable economic
development of semi-arid rangelands in Zimbabwe, Oxford University.
Child,
B and JH Peterson (1991). CAMPFIRE in rural development: the Beitbridge
Experience. Joint Working Paper. Harare, Centre for Applied Social
Studies, Department of National Parks and Wildlife.
Chonde,
B (n.d.). Community Development from Below : The Case of ADMADE Programme in
Zambia, USAID.
De
Boer, W and D Baquete (1998). “Natural resource use, crop damage and attitudes
of rural people in the vicinity of the Maputo Elephant Reserve, Mozambique.” Environmental
Conservation 25(3): 208-218.
Participation by local
communities in management is widely considered
a means of sustaining protected areas. In parts of the world with a
history of armed conflict, the chances of such an approach being successfully
adopted might seem remote. One such area is the Maputo Elephant Reserve in
southern Mozambique. The aim was to improve understanding of the local people's
use of natural resources and perceptions of the Reserve's impact. Interviews
and questionnaires distributed in four different villages were used to estimate
the relative value of these resources
in relation to the attitude of the local people towards the Reserve. The people
gave a relative value rank for each specific use of each plant, animal and fish
resource. On average 60% of the households exploited more than two different
resource categories. The plant resources of the Reserve were used by 71% of the households and were valued more
highly than animal and fish resources. Plants were used for many purposes;
construction material, fuelwood and fruits had the highest relative values.
Antelopes, hippopotamus and elephants were valued highest amongst a range
of animal species which were hunted by
21% of households. Amongst uses of animals, consumption, use of the skins and
commercial sale of the meat were especially important. When asked if they liked
the Reserve, 88% of respondents answered positively. The attitude towards the
Reserve was correlated with crop damage experiences; people with crop damage
caused by elephants, hippos or bushpigs, were more negative. Attitude of
respondents was inversely related to the number of species invading their agricultural fields. Resource use
intensity, use purpose, resource value and attitude were different amongst
sites and dependent on site-specific circumstances, different management
strategies could be necessary for the four sites. A resource management plan
should be drawn up, local people should be included in the management team and
steps should be taken to improve the relationship between the Reserve's authorities and the local
population generally. (Journal)
Dourojeanni,
MJ (1978). The integrated management
of forest wildlife as a source of protein for rural populations. Paper
presented at the Eighth World Forestry Congress, Jakarta.
Ellis,
S (1994). “Of elephants and men: politics and nature conservation in South
Africa.” Journal of Southern African Studies 20(1): 53-69.
South Africa's policy of
destabilisation of neighbouring countries was closely associated with the rise
of South Africa as a leading middleman in the international ivory trade. South
African-based traders, acting in partnership or with protection from officers
of the South African Military Intelligence Directorate, imported raw ivory from
Angola, Mozambique and points further north and re-exported it to markets in
the Far East. This was a source of income both for the South African secret
services and for individuals associated with them. The same trade routes were
also used for trade in other goods, including rhino horn, drugs, gems, currency
and weapons. This was not only as a means of earning money but also a technique
of destabilisation in itself. The
extent of South Africa's involvement in this trade, although suspected by some
conservationists, was difficult to prove and did not form the target of any
concerted campaign by the leading conservation groups world-wide. In this
respect, the strength of the South Africa lobby in the World-Wide Fund for
Nature seems to have played a significant role. Since the ending of South
Africa's military presence in Namibia and Angola in 1989, the Military
Intelligence officers, Special Forces officers and others who conducted the
wars for the defence of white South Africa have been intent on the struggle
inside South Africa itself. There is evidence that such counter-insurgency
specialists are now using Mozambique in particular as a base for operations
inside South Africa. Moreover, they continue to have an interest in the ivory
and rhino horn trades. Former officers of specialist counter-insurgency units
have also found employment as game wardens in national parks. The bold
proposals currently being implemented to create large new game parks along the
South African-Mozambican border, using modern management techniques and
involving local communities in their management, have important implications
for politics and national security. (Source)
Gibson,
C and S Marks (1995). “Transforming rural hunters in conservationists: an
assessment of community-based wildlife management programs in Africa.” World
Development 23(6): 941-957.
The failure of conventional
wildlife management in Eastern and Southern Africa has led several countries to
implement community-based wildlife programs.
We examine the assumptions these initiatives make about rural hunters,
and describe how the programs attempt to induce individuals away from illegal
hunting. Using game theory and a case study from Zambia, we find that these
programs misunderstand some of the economic, political and social benefits of
local hunting. As a results,
community-based wildlife management schemes succeed in protecting some of the
larger mammals only by virtue of their increased enforcement levels, not their
ability to distribute socioeconomic benefits.
Rather than support conservation, local hunters continue to kill game at
a rate comparable to the days before the programs, although they have shifted
their tactics and prey selection. (Source)
Hasler,
R (1993). Political Ecologies of Scale and the Multi-Tiered Co-management of
Zimbabwean Wildlife Resources under CAMPFIRE. Harare, University of Zimbabwe,
Center for Applied Social Sciences.
Hasler,
R (1994). Cultural perceptions and conflicting rights to wildlife in the
Zambezi Valley. in Elephants and Whales: Resources for Whom?Ed.
Basel, Gordon and Breach Publishers S.
A: 85-97.
Hess, K
(1997). “Wild success: saving elephants, crocodiles, and other endangered
wildlife once meant trampled crops and violent death to the villagers of
southern Africa.” Reason 29:
32-41.
Examines community-based efforts
to market wildlife products in a sustainable manner; focus on the CAMPFIRE
program of the Department of National Parks and Wildlife, Zimbabwe.
Hill,
CM (1998). “Conflicting attitudes towards elephants around the Budongo Forest
Reserve, Uganda.” Environmental Conservation 25(3): 244-250.
Attitudes of local people to
wildlife, and particularly to large animals, are an increasingly important
element of conservation work, but attitudes may vary within a community according
to gender, and prior experience of wildlife. Data mere collected by
questionnaire and informal interviews with 59 men and 57 women living on the
southern edge of the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda, to assess the influence of
these factors in attitudes towards elephants, in an area from which they are
now absent, and to conservation in general. It was hypothesized that prior
experience of elephants might influence people's perceptions of them, and that
this in turn might influence their attitudes towards the issue of elephant
conservation. The results of this study did not generally support this. There
was no evidence that people with prior experience of elephants were any more
likely to support their conservation than were people who did not have prior
experience of them. Within this community men and women expressed very
different views as to the behaviour of elephants. Women were more likely than
men to report that elephants were dangerous, irrespective of whether they had
seen an elephant or not. Locally, conservation was considered to be
particularly important and beneficial as a strategy because it 'should help
ensure protection of people and their crops from marauding elephants and other
animals'. Attitudes to, and expectations of, conservation as a strategy also
varied between members of this community with respect to gender, but age and
ethnic group were not good predictors of whether people were likely to be
supportive of conservation issues or not. (Author)
Hill,
KA (1991). “Zimbabwe wildlife conservation regime - rural farmers and the
state.” Human Ecology 19(1): 19-34.
This article examines the rhino
and elephant conservation policies of Zimbabwe, focusing on the historical
experiences of rural farmers with colonial and post-colonial wildlife policies.
It begins by defining the social and political ramifications of the current
environmental conservation debate in Africa, and how these are crucially
affected by rural people's perceptions of environmental goods. Next, the paper
explores the exploitative colonial legacy of wildlife conservation in Zimbabwe,
and how that legacy has or has not been transformed since independence. The
paper pays close attention to the development of linkages between rural
farmers, local conservation NGOs, and local and national governmental bodies.
Finally, the paper finds that, while many positive linkages have been made
between conservation authorities and rural farmers and ranchers in elephant
conservation programs, few such linkages have been made in the various rhino
conservation schemes. Such Zimbabwe has been relatively successful in
conserving its elephant population, but relatively unsuccessful in stopping
rhino poaching, the paper concludes that the development of positive linkages
between rural farmers and the state, which include heavy doses of popular
participation at the grassroots level, is crucial for any successful natural
resource policy. (Journal)
Hill,
KA (1994). “Politicians, farmers, and ecologists: commercial wildlife ranching
and the politics of land in Zimbabwe.” Journal of Asian and African Studies
29(3).
Kenya
Wildlife Service (1990). Community Conservation and Wildlife Management outside
Parks and Reserves: Policy Framework and Development Programme 1991-1996.
Nairobi, KWS.
Kiss,
A, Ed. (1990). Living with Wildlife: Wildlife Resource management with Local
Participation in Africa. World Bank
Technical Paper, no. 130. Africa
Technical Department Series. Washington DC, World Bank.
Examines the experience, the
potential, and the constraints of wildlife management programs, which involve
and benefit local people. Discusses the
objectives of wildlife utilization and management schemes and explores the
integration of conservation and economic development based on sustainable
exploitation of wildlife resources.
Defines the economic, policy, technical, sociological, institutional,
and human resource development issues in community-based wildlife management
and suggests ways to address them.
Presents case studies examining seventeen projects in twelve African
countries. Describes two types of
projects: projects whose initial objective was preserving particular endangered
species or protected areas and projects not centered on protected areas and
which aim to develop wildlife resources to improve the living standard of rural
communities. Assesses wildlife
utilization as a land-use option,
focusing on the semi-arid rangelands of southern Africa. (Source)
Latour,
B ( 1997). “Local politics and practical ecology: when the Masai enter the
elephants in the storehouse of Western science [Politique locale et ecologie
pratique: quand les Masai font entrer les elephants dans le magasin de la
science occidentale].” Recherche
85.
Discusses community-based
conservation, an environmental philosophy that advocates a combination of
ecology & economy in maintaining environmental equilibrium by the united
management of humans & their environment, rather than concentrating on the
preservation of an isolated species. It is argued that this philosophy does not
make a clear distinction between the factors of ecology & economy &
more alarmingly, fails to adequately assess differences in the societies &
environmental factors between developing & technologically advanced
countries. It is maintained that intact nature without human intervention or
effects is an impossible concept, illustrated by the situation of elephants in
Kenya trampling a park & the Masai's shambas while migrating. (Anthrolit)
Leader-Williams,
N and EJ Miller-Gulland (1993). “Policies for the enforcement of wildlife laws;
the balance between detection and penalties in Luangwa Valley, Zambia.” Conservation
Biology 7(3): 611-617.
Lewis,
D, G Kaweche, et al. (1990). “Wildlife conservation outside protected
areas-lessons from an experiment in Zambia.” Conservation Biology 4(2):
171-180.
Lewis,
D and A Phiri (1998). “Wildlife snaring - an indicator of community response to
a community-based conservation project.” Oryx 32(2): 111-121.
The use of wire snares for
catching wildlife to support household needs was treated as an indicator to evaluate community support and understanding for a community-based resource
management project. Data were based on
snare counts in areas surrounding the targeted
community as well as from interviews with individuals purported to have had a history of snaring.
The high use of snares conflicted with
expected behaviour for a community benefiting from the project. Snaring levels were high enough to
threaten the viability of the safari
industry and the derived revenues that were meant to be shared with the community. These contradictions
suggested flaws in the project: an
overdependence on external donor-supported management and lack of real community involvement and leadership in
management of the resource. This study
underscores the critical importance for monitoring land-use behaviour as an indicator of the success of community-based management projects.
(Source)
Lewis,
DM (1995). “Importance of GIS to community-based management of wildlife -
lessons from Zambia.” Ecological Applications 5(4): 861-871.
Wildlife resources under the protective custodianship of
skilled managers can thrive and sustain
important revenues. Such custodianship is generally lacking among communal rural
societies in Africa becauseof land use policies that overlook the capacity and
the practical importance of actively engaging these societies in wildlife
management. In Zambia participation by local village communities in this
management is recognized as a prerequisite for wildlife development and
conservation. This participation is permitted through the administrative management design (called ADMADE) for game
management areas. To help improve the capacity of rural communities to become
more knowledgeable and effective in managing their wildlife resources, a
geographical information system (GIS), based on ARC/INFO software, was applied and tested as an
appropriate technology. It was hypothesized that maps composed of easily
recognizable information about land use issues affecting the welfare of local
residents and their natural resources would facilitate communal societies to
make technically improved land use
decisions with broad-based support
within the community. Results offered a growing set of achievements in
land use planning by local community leaders in support of this hypothesis.
Custom designed maps produced by this technology were used by these leaders to
explain and build consensus at the community level on ways to resolve resource
use conflicts. Results also demonstrated
the pragmatic and cost-effective value of training local residents to
participate in the collection of GIS data as a way of making maps more locally
acceptable and better focused on relevant issues and needs. (Source)
Lewis,
DM and P Alpert (1997). “Trophy hunting and wildlife conservation in Zambia.” Conservation
Biology 11(1): 59-68.
For wildlife conservation to
succeed in developing countries, people who live in or near protected areas
must receive benefits that offset the costs of their reduced access to natural
resources. International trophy hunting is currently generating significant
economic benefits for residents of game management areas in Zambia. This has
been made possible through a revolving fund and an administrative program that
direct revenues from trophy hunting to local wildlife management and community
developmental projects. Benefits might be enhanced by better biological
information for management greater local participation in the allocation and
operation of hunting concessions, and the promotion of ecological and ethical
standards for trophy hunting. An international system of certification for
trophy hunting operations could foster these improvements. (Journal)
Luisigi,
WJ (1984). “New approaches to wildlife conservation in Kenya.” Ambio
10(2/3): 87-92.
Marks,
S (1984). The Imperial Lion: Human Dimensions of Wildlife Management in
Central Africa. Boulder, Westview Press.
Matawanyika,
JZZ (1989). “Cast out of Eden: Peasants vs wildlife policy in savanna Africa.” Alternatives
16.
Matzke,
GE and N Nabane (1996). “Outcomes of a community controlled wildlife
utilization program in a Zambezi Valley community.” Human Ecology 24: 65-85.
Zimbabwe is devolving
substantial wildlife management responsibility to local government, and ultimately
to local communities, through its Communal Areas Management Program for
Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE) program.
This paper's purpose is to explore the notion that CAMPFIRE offers a
useful model for sustainable development discussions by examining the program's
impacts in one case study location. It
presents a legislative history of the CAMPFIRE Program before specifying the
spatial criteria that explain ideal CAMPFIRE sites. Thereafter, it reports
results from a study of the development impacts of locally controlled wildlife
management in Masoka, an isolated CAMPFIRE community in the Zambezi
Valley. The village has developed a
land use plan, fenced its fields and settlements, reduced wild animal attacks
on people and crops, provided access to primary education for both boys and
girls, created local employment, and provided money for household food
purchases during a severe drought. In
Masoka, the implementation of CAMPFIRE seems to successfully provide incentives
to protect megafauna and their habitats.
For Masoka, CAMPFIRE has provided an alternative model to statist
solutions emphasizing centralized control for biodiversity conservation
purposes. (Author)
McShane,
T (1990). “Wildlands and human-needs - Resource use in an African protected
area.” Landscape and Urban Planning 19(2): 145-158.
Mesterton-Gibbons,
M and E Milner-Gulland (1998). “On the strategic stability of monitoring:
implications for cooperative wildlife management programmes in Africa.” Proceedings
of the Royal Society of London Series-B Biological Sciences 265(1402):
1237-1244.
Game-theoretic modelling is used
to study the design of an agreement among residents to conserve a wildlife
resource, by not hunting animals illegally when the community monitors its own
behaviour. The analysis demonstrates that such an agreement may be very much
costlier for a government to sustain if its incentive structure avoids the
payment of monitoring fees, and instead relies on community benefits for
conservation, with bonuses for reporting poachers. Conditions are identified
for the agreement to be stable against both the temptation to avoid monitoring
and the temptation to poach, either with guns or by snaring. In particular, the
size of the community must exceed a critical value. Implications are discussed
for community-based wildlife management programmes in Africa. (Author)
Metcalfe,
S (1994). The Zimbabwe Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous
Resources (CAMPFIRE). in Natural Connections: Perspectives in
Community-based Conservation. D Western and RM Wright, Ed. Washington DC,
Island Press.
Mongi,
ALD (1978). The integrated management of forest wildlife as a source of
protein for rural populations - with particular reference to East Africa. Paper presented at the Eighth World Forestry
Congress, Jakarta.
Murombedzi,
JC (1991). Decentralizing common property resources management: a case study of
the Nyaminyami district council of Zimbabwe's wildlife management programme. IIED Drylands Networks Programme Paper #30.
London, International Institute for Environment and Development.
Murombedzi,
JC (1992). Decentralization or recentralization? Implementing CAMPFIRE in the
Omay Communal Lands of the Nyaminyami District. Harare, University of Zimbabwe,
Center for Applied Social Sciences.
Murphree,
MW (1990). Decentralizing the proprietorship of wildlife resources in
Zimbabwe's communal lands. CASS Occasional Paper, Centre for Applied Social
Studies. Harare, University of Zimbabwe.
Murphree,
MW (1990). Research on the institutional contexts of wildlife utilization in
the communal areas of East and Southern Africa. Harare, Centre for Applied Social Studies, University of
Zimbabwe.
Murphree,
MW (1991). Communities as Institutions for Resource Management. Harare,
University of Zimbabwe.
Murphree,
MW (1993). Communities as Resource Management Institutions. IIED Gatekeeper Series #36. London, International Institute for
Environment and Development.
Murphree,
MW (1994). The role of institutions in community -based conservation. in Natural
Connections: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation. D Western and RM
Wright, Ed. Washington DC, Island Press: 403-427.
Nabane,
N and G Matzke (1997). “A gender-sensitive analysis of a community-based
wildlife utilization initiative in Zimbabwe's Zambezi Valley.” Society and
Natural Resources 10: 519-535.
Zimbabwe's CAMPFIRE program is a
grassroots natural resource management
initiative promoting utilization of natural resources, usually wildlife,
as an economic and sustainable land use
option in Zimbabwe's rural areas. Under
CAMPFIRE, the village of Masoka developed a plan to allocate a large
portion of the land under its control
to leased hunting safari operations. A smaller
portion was protected by a wildlife fence and allocated to cultivation
and settlement. This study examines the
development consequences of this
initiative with reference to the differential outcomes for men and
women. The program, and associated
development activity, has initiated many changes in village life. Some of these have led women into opportunities
that were formerly not available,
including formal education, cash payments, and paid employment. Although the process of change points to greater
inclusion of women,. men still have
substantially greater access to money from CAMPFIRE. (Source)
Naughton-Treves,
L (1997). “Farming the forest edge: vulnerable places and people around Kibale
National Park, Uganda.” Geographical Review 87(1): 27- 46.
Subsistence farmers near Kibale
National Park, Uganda, fear and resent many wildlife species. In this article I
compare records of crop damage by wildlife and livestock with local complaints
about the worst animals and the most vulnerable crops. I discuss the
concordance and discrepancies in complaints versus actual damage in light of
physical parameters of risk and of social factors that shape perceptions and
vulnerabilities. Crop losses were greatest at the edge of the forest,
where immigrants are disproportionately
represented. State proprietorship of wildlife amplifies local vulnerability and
constrains traditional coping strategies, such as hunting. (Author)
Neumann,
RP (1992). “The political ecology of wildlife conservation in the Mt. Meru area
of northeast Tanzania.” Land Degradation and Rehabilitation 3: 85-98.
The wildlife conservation
problems in Tanzania are examined from a political ecology perspective. The analysis is historical, exploring the
establishment of national parks under British colonial rule and the tightening
of state control over access to resources at the expense of customary
rights. Examples are presented from the
Mt. Meru area of north-eastern Tanzania.
During the colonial period, the formal political debate over land and
resource rights was conducted without the participation of African
peasants. After independence the state
continued to assert control over resource access unilaterally. As Meru peasants have effectively been out
of the formal political process, their only resource for defending the loss of
access to natural resources is everyday forms of resistance, including de facto
alliances with commercial poachers and "foot dragging" in regards to
compliance with conservation laws.
Consequently there is little local support for current wildlife
conservation policies on Mt. Meru and wildlife populations have declined in the
30 years since Arusha National Park was established. (Source)
Neumann,
RP (1998). Imposing Wilderness: Struggles Over Livelihood and Nature
Preservation in Africa. Berkeley, University of Berkeley Press.
Newmark,
W, D Manyanza, et al. (1994). “The conflict between wildlife and local people
living adjacent to protected areas in Tanzania: human density as a predictor.” Conservation
Biology 8(1): 249-255.
Newmark,
WD, NL Leonard, et al. (1993). “Conservation attitudes of local people living
adjacent to five protected areas in Tanzania.” Biological Conservation
63: 177-183.
Njiforti,
HL (1996). “Preferences and present demand for bushmeat in north Cameroon: some
implications for wildlife conservation.” Environmental Conservation
23(2): 149-155.
Norton-Griffiths,
M and C Southey (1995). “The opportunity costs of biodiversity conservation in
Kenya.” Ecological Economics 12(2): 125-139.
This paper estimates the
opportunity costs of biodiversity conservation in Kenya from the potential net
returns of agricultural and livestock production, and compares them with the
net returns from tourism, forestry and other conservation activities. At the
national level, agricultural and livestock production in the parks, reserves
and forests of Kenya could support 4.2 million Kenyans and generate gross
annual revenues of $565 m and net returns of $203m. These forgone net returns
of $203m, some 2.8% of GDP, represent the opportunity cost to Kenya of
biodiversity conservation. The current combined net revenues of $42m from
wildlife tourism and forestry are quite inadequate to cover these opportunity
costs to land. The government of Kenya is clearly subsidising conservation
activities whose chief values are all indirect and external to Kenya, and their
ability to continue doing so will be a function of growth and modernisation in
the Kenyan economy. Dependency on land will increase if the economy stagnates
and rural populations continue to grow, and while the government of today may
not consider degazetting parks and reserves, the situation could be quite
different in 25 years when rural populations have doubled yet again. In
contrast, dependency on land will fall only once the economy grows and
modernises and rural populations are drawn off the land and into industrial and
service sectors. Given the global nature of the benefits from Kenya's
conservation efforts, it is quite inappropriate that so much of the cost is
born by Kenya. The present scale of subsidies should instead form the basis for
international negotiations to transfer funds to meet all or part of them. At
present the global environment facility (GEF) is the only operational programme
through which such contributions can be channelled to meet the incremental costs
of biodiversity conservation, but situations such as the one described here for
Kenya were never envisaged when the GEF was designed. If the developed world
expects a country like Kenya to maintain conservation estate on its behalf,
then it must be prepared to contribute substantially towards these costs until
such time as Kenya can afford to carry the burden itself. (Journal)
Noss, A
(1997). “The economic importance of communal net hunting among the BaAka of the
Central African Republic.” Human Ecology 25(1): 71-89.
This article examines current
net hunting practice by BaAka Pygmies of central Africa. In terms of time
allocation, net hunting remains the single most important activity for the
BaAka. But net hunting is only one in a range of subsistence and economic
activities among which individuals switch on a daily basis. Returns from net
hunting are roughly equivalent to those from competing activities. Several
factors encourage the decline of net hunting and its replacement with snare
hunting: enforcement of park regulations, higher individual returns to snare
hunting, and greater involvement in formal employment and agriculture. However;
net hunting has not been abandoned completely for several reasons: the local
market demand for bushmeat is growing, numerous forest products besides meat
are collected on net hunts, and economic alternatives remain irregular and
unreliable. (Journal)
Nsanjama,
H (1997). “People and animals vie for Africa's ecosystems.” Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy 12: 136-138.
Competition for habitat between humans and animals has frayed the
traditional fabric of African life.
Nowhere is the unraveling more obvious than on the borders of the national
parks. "In many cases, local
inhabitants are forbidden from even setting foot inside national parks without
a permit," says Henri Nsanjama, vice president for the African and
Madagascar Program of the World Wildlife Fund in Washington, D.C. Animals, on the other hand, occasionally
stray beyond the borders in search of food.
A herd of elephants can wipe out an entire village's yearly supply of
food and seed in one night. The greatest threat to endangered species is not
the wanton slaughter of animals, but "the impending conflict between
people and animals for a finite amount of living space," Nsanjama
notes. To ensure harmony between humans
and their environment, rural communities must be able to realize tangible
economic benefits from conservation and ecotourism. (Source)
Osemeobo,
GJ (1988). “Animal wildlife conservation under multiple use land systems in
Nigeria.” Environmental Conservation
15(3): 239-249.
Osemeobo,
GJ (1991). “Effects of common property resources utilization on wildlife
conservation in Nigeria.” Geojournal 23: 241-248.
Peterson,
JH (1991). CAMPFIRE: A Zimbabwean approach to sustainable development and
community empowerment through wildlife utilization. Harare, Centre for Applied
Social Studies, University of Zimbabwe.
Peterson,
JHJ and UP Kreuter (1994). Sustainable wildlife use for community development
in Zimbabwe. in Elephants and Whales: Resources for Whom?Ed. Basel,
Gordon and Breach Publishers S. A: 99-111.
Pinchin,
A (1992). Conservation and wildlife management in Zimbabwe. London, Private press.
Ricciuti,
ER (1993). “The elephant wars.” Wildlife Conservation
96: 14-34.
The conflicts arising from human
interaction with the African elephant are discussed, and possible solutions are
examined. The situation in Kenya and
Zimbabwe is taken as a model. The
success of anti poaching programs and the collapse of the international ivory
trade has caused a steady increase in elephant populations in these
countries. Local concentrations of the
animals in and around protected areas now threaten the lives and livelihoods of
indigenous people farming nearby.
Conservation interests recognize that the elephants have become a
problem but regard confinement, culling, and birth control as unsatisfactory
solutions. A pilot program that gives
affected farmers responsibility for wildlife and a share in the tourist revenue
it generates is currently under way in Zimbabwe. The initiative is hampered by disagreements between
administrators and the community. (Wilson web)
Schulz,
C and A Skonhoft (1996). “Wildlife management, land-use and conflicts.” South
African Journal of Wildlife Research 26(4): 151-159.
The paper analyses the conflict
between wildlife conservation and its accompanying land use in an East African
context. In the model there are two agents. First, there is an agency managing
the wildlife and the habitat of the wildlife, which is referred to as parkland.
On the other hand, there is the group of agro-pastoralists living in the
vicinity of the wildlife habitat, whose land use is referred to as rangelands.
The parkland is used for tourism production and hunting, while the rangelands
are used for agropastoral production. Both agents will find it beneficial to
expand their land-use, so there is a land-use conflict. This is analysed in two
steps. First, social optimality is studied; then the utilization of the
wildlife and its accompanying land-use when there is no unified resource policy
and the park agency follows its self-interest. The effects of the two different
management schemes of changing economic conditions, such as the recommendations
of the CITES convention and a programme subsidizing agro-pastoral production,
are discussed. (Journal)
Skonhoft,
A (1995). “On the conflicts of wildlife management in Africa.” International
Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 2(4): 267-277.
The paper analyses the conflict
between wildlife conservation and the costs and benefits obtained from it in an
East African context. A well defined agency is managing a national park of
fixed area. Wildlife is also assumed to be 'owned' by the park authority. The
park owner has therefore economic incentives to conserve the wildlife. The
management policy, however, does not take into account the damage caused to the
production of the agropastoralists living in the proximity of the park by the
wildlife roaming freely in and out of the park. The conflict is first analysed
in a one-species framework. Next, the model is extended to a two-species
framework where the species compete for grazing lands. (Journal)
Skonhoft,
A (1998). “Resource utilization, property rights and welfare - Wildlife and the
local people.” Ecological Economics
26(1): 67-80.
The paper analyses the conflict
between wildlife conservation and the costs and benefits obtained from it in an
East African context. In the model there are two agents: a park agency managing
a national park of fixed size and a group of agropastoralists living in the
vicinity of the park. The park authority produces tourism services and sells
hunting licences, whereas the agropastoralists produce livestock products.
Wildlife and livestock interact with each other and wildlife is a nuisance for
livestock production. The conflict is analysed under different market solutions
as the agropastoralists, to various degrees, are given profit shares from the
park activities. It is demonstrated that a market solution where they are given
property rights in the form of a fixed share of the harvesting profit, will
increase the nuisance on their production and therefore generally give no clear
welfare gain for the local people. On the other hand, if they also receive a
profit share from the tourist activity above that of the hunting benefit, the
nuisance from the roaming wildlife will decrease as this scheme gives
incentives for the park manager to increase the offtake and thereby decrease
the wildlife stock in the- long term. There will therefore be more livestock
and a clear welfare gain for the agropastoralists compared to the situation
where they have no property rights. Under certain conditions, the stock sizes will
also be closer to what is optimal from an overall point of view. (Journal)
Spinage,
C (1998). “Social change and conservation misrepresentation in Africa.” Oryx
32(4): 265-276.
Concomitant with the increasing
denouncement of African game legislation as inappropriate law imposed by a
former colonial authority, is the attack upon traditional, i.e. total
protection, practice of conservation. It is increasingly argued by a school of
neo-populist thinkers, that local people should be allowed to exploit protected
areas in accordance with their own traditions and beliefs. Examples of alleged
injustice or practice are consistently misrepresented with a view to replacing
traditional conservation practice with left-wing political dogma, proponents
claiming a mandate from the Caracas 1992 IVth World Congress on National Parks
and Protected Areas. (Journal)
Thomas,
SJ (1992). The legacy of dualism and decision making: the prospects for local
institutional development in CAMPFIRE. Joint Working Paper, Department of National
Parks and Wildlife, Zimbabwe, and Centre for Applied Social Studies, University
of Zimbabwe, Harare.
Wainwright,
C and W Wehrmeyer (1998). “Success in integrating conservation and development?
A study from Zambia.” World
Development 26(6): 933-944.
Over the past decade, Zambia,
like several other Southern African countries, has introduced community-based
natural resource management (CBNRM) projects in several rural areas. These
initiatives attempt to combine both conservation and development initiatives
into an integrated approach, aimed at promoting rural development-based on
natural resources as well as encouraging conservation awareness. This critical
review examines the impact of the Luangwa Integrated Resource Development
Project (LIRDP) at the community level. The research suggests that LIRDP has
generally failed to achieve its conservation and development objectives and
that the program has achieved few community benefits. The underlying causes of
the project's shortcomings are discussed and corrective policy is suggested. By
placing the survey findings into the wider debate about community-based
conservation, the research has implications for rural development as well as
community-based natural resource management. (Source)
Waithaka,
J (1993). “The elephant menace.” Wildlife Conservation
96: 62-63.
Governments in Africa must address the increasing number of
conflicts that arise where elephants and humans live in close association. In Kenya, as elsewhere in Africa, government
wildlife policies have concentrated elephants in protected national parks where
they compete with humans and domestic animals for water and food
resources. The elephants damage crops,
trees, and buildings. In addition, they
have attacked, injured, and killed humans.
In Kenya, there is no direct compensation for such injury or
damage. The Community Wildlife Program
aims to protect people and property and to increase the economic benefits
accruing to those living in areas of the country that support wildlife. (Wilsonweb)
Western,
D (1982). “Amboseli National Park: Enlisting landowners to conserve migratory
wildlife.” Ambio 11(5): 302-308.
Wilkie,
DS, B Curran, et al. (In press). “Modeling the sustainability of subsistence
farming and hunting in the Ituri Forest of Zaire.” Conservation Biology.