Given that this is a new site, may I make a suggestion?

> **Don't use tags**. 

At all. If you can't do that, then, whatever you do, at least don't increase the tag set.

The tag sets on the two other linguistically-oriented SEs that I participate in (Linguistics.SE and English Grammar and Usage.SE) are hopelessly confused and utterly worthless. They contain every possible zombie rule and grammatical term, applied to absolutely any conceivable context, and they don't help anybody.

In a field like computer science (which is where SEs originated, clearly), there is a pragmatic sanction on opinions -- either they work or they don't. This makes crowdsourcing problems and terminology useful, since a consensus can be built on actual facts. 

In the field of English grammar, there are three prominent perceptual systems:

 - English grammar as perceived by grammarians  
 - English grammar as perceived by native English speakers  
 - English grammar as perceived by non-native English speakers and learners  

These are extremely different perspectives, to say the least. They all use their own terminology, and they all use many of the same terms. In completely different ways. Which means crowdsourcing is impossible because almost nobody knows the facts to base it on. Most of these "facts" were learned in grammar school, but it seems everybody went to a different school, because there is **no** consensus about this terminology. 

Furthermore -- here's the kicker -- ignorant (though often well-meaning) teachers and writers and advice-givers have used these terms for generations in totally strange ways to try to teach ESL, or to try to teach what passes for "English grammar" in Anglophone schools (mainly a catechism of *Thou Shalt Not*'s which create the usual Anglophone state of anxious cluelessness about English grammar).

The result is as you see. Chaos. This may be inevitable, but it doesn't need to be incremented.  
(Just sayin')