|
||||||||||
Football Picks During week fours games, in which the Review
and Daily went head to head, the Review had 6
wins and 4 losses, whereas the Daily picked 21 winners and
19 losers. During week five, we went 6 and 7. We were too lazy to
figure out how the Daily did. Essentially, George
Washington beat the Dailys experts in the first line
up. And now good ol G.W. is back for another round! The picks were made using a standard 1967 United States quarter, flipped using the typical thumb action and allowing the quarter to hit the ground. In every game, one team was heads, the other tails. Whoever won the toss was to be the random pick. The best bet used the state of the art digital technology found in a compact disc player. After counting how many games where predicted in a given week, we found a CD with the same number of tracks as games. Then, we placed the CD in the drive, hit random, and whatever track played became the game number that was to be the random best bet. Predictions were made on all games involving top 25 teams, as of this printing. The predicted winner, against the spread, is in CAPS. October 9, 1999 1. Florida St. v. Miami 2. Penn St. v. Iowa 3. Florida v.
Alabama 5. Texas A&M v. Baylor 6. Nebraska v. Iowa
St. 7. Tennesse v. Georgia 8. Virginia Tech.
v. Rutgers 9. Georgia Tech.
v. North Carolina 10. Georgia v. Tennessee 11. Purdue v. OSU 13. Kansas St. v.
Kansas 14. Michigan St. v. Michigan 15. Texas v.
Oklahoma 16. Mississippi v. Auburn 19. East Carolina
v. Southern Mississippi 20. Arkansas v.
Middle Tennessee St. 22. Syracuse v.
Pittsburgh 23. Oklahoma v.
Texas 24. Virginia v.
Duke 25. Oregon v.
UCLA *Best Bet: Iowa
State* October 16, 1999 1. Florida St. v. Wake
Forest 2. Penn St. v. OSU 3. Florida v.
Auburn 5. Texas A&M
v. Kansas 8. Virginia Tech. v. Syracuse 9. Georgia Tech. v. Duke 10. Georgia v. Vanderbilt 11. Purdue v. Michigan
St. 13. Kansas St. v.
Utah St. 17. Marshal v.
Toledo 18. Miami v.
Temple 20. Arkansas v.
South Carolina 21. Alabama v. Mississippi 24. Virginia v. North Carolina |