Stop the Witchhunt—No. 7

No Evidence — NO CASE!
Produce the Fence Or Drop the Charges!
Fighting Racism Is Not a Crime!

 
On July 16 the people of Ann Arbor will have an opportunity to put an end to the disgraceful political witchhunt launched by their city government one year ago against antiracists who protested the May 9, 1998 Ku Klux Klan rally.

On Friday, July 16, at 12Noon, there will be an antiracist picket at the courthouse in downtown Ann Arbor. At 1PM, an evidentiary hearing for ten antiracist defendants will take place in Judge Ann Mattson’s courtroom.

In the wake of the acquittal of Ryan Lang (see box) the Ann Arbor city government’s witchhunt against antiracists is beginning to fall apart. This hearing is an opportunity to deliver what would likely be a decisive blow to the more than a year old witchhunt. Getting the ten misdemeanor charges dismissed on the heels of the powerful victory against the felony "riot" charge in Ryan’s case could well finish off these prosecutions altogether.

Victory!

On Friday, June 4, just after 7PM, an all-white six person jury found 16-year-old antiracist Ryan Lang not guilty of "Riot" and all other charges. The jury deliberated for less than an hour after the three-day trial. The jury refused to even convict Ryan of the frivolous lesser included misdemeanor "Disturbing the Peace". The verdict drew a burst of applause from the crowded courtroom gallery as it was read.

One juror, immediately following the not guilty verdict said: "I can put it in a nutshell for you. They had no evidence – no evidence at all."

In sharp contrast to the prosecution case (which made up for having what jurors called "no evidence at all" with an effort as relentless as it was ineffective to convict Ryan on the basis of guilt-by-association) the defense case was truthful and compelling. A long and diverse series of witnesses all testified to the central proposition of the defense: there was no riot on May 9, 1998.

All antiracists and all who care about civil liberties should attend.

The ten defendants are some of the hundreds of antiracists who protested the Ku Klux Klan rally in Ann Arbor on May 9, 1998. They are accused of having damaged the chain link rental fence erected by the city government as part of its $137,000 project to protect and stage the KKK’s rally. The charge is a misdemeanor called "Malicious Destruction of Property Under $100".

Given that the only physical evidence in these cases – the chain link fence itself – was destroyed with the authorization of the police, the evidentiary hearing to determine whether and if so, when, how, where and by whom the fence was damaged should prove very difficult for the prosecution. Among the defendants are prominent antiracists and leaders of the movement to defend affirmative action and the Defend Affirmative Action Party at the University of Michigan.

 

NO EVIDENCE – NO RECORD

The police and prosecutor’s office are claiming that the fence was damaged, but the police department never made any assessment of the condition of the fence. The fence company made a casual and entirely cursory assessment of the fence. Knowing they had a standard blank-check insurance policy from the city for any assessment of material loss – they had a financial incentive to bend the stick in the direction of assessing damage. No record was ever made of the alleged damage by either the police or the fence company.

The police then allowed the basis of these charges to be scrapped and melted down, leaving only the bill from the fence company as "evidence" of damage.

This bill is now the lynchpin of ten misdemeanor charges. The fence company, of course, could have no notion that the bill they wrote up on the basis of this cursory assessment of the condition of the fence would later be the central piece of evidence in criminal charges against ten people. The company has a vested interest in maintaining the position that the fence was damaged.

Police photographs of the fence after the rally, still images secured from police video, eyewitness affidavits of neutral observers, including several Peace Team members, an expert witness affidavit from the owner/operator of a fence company who viewed the fence in question on multiple police videos all indicate that there was no damage done to the rental fence. In fact, the Peace Team re-erected the fence subsequent to it being pulled from the poles by the counter-demonstrators.

Below is a quote from the introduction to the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Charges.
 

* * *

"There is, however, an even more weighty obstacle to proceeding with these cases than the demonstrable innocence of the accused.

There is no evidence.

The police authorized the removal and allowed the destruction of the decisive and the only piece of physical evidence -- the subject of the alleged crime itself -- the chain link fence. Without the fence there is no case.

The police made no record of the damage they allege; no video, no still photographs, not so much as a leaf from a police notebook is to be found in the police reports that document the damage that defendants are alleged to have caused.

It is bad faith for the police to pay the fence company to remove and destroy the very subject of charges and yet continue to pursue prosecution. […]

Not only does the nonexistence of the physical evidence make genuine, searching evaluation impossible for a future jury, it makes independent investigation impossible for the defendants.

Justice, common sense and law dictate the impossibility of proceeding without this evidence."

Please attend this evidentiary hearing and help make sure justice is done.
 

Picket and Attend the Evidentiary Hearing!

Friday, July 16, 12 Noon
Downtown Courthouse
(Main & Huron, Ann Arbor)

1999.07.04 

[Back to HOME]


Ann Arbor Antiracist Defense Campaign
National Women’s Rights Organizing Coalition

PO Box 1092 Penobscot Station, Detroit, MI. 48231  (313) 730-3577

www.umich.edu/~nwroc * nwroc@umich.edu