DISSERTATION
ABSTRACTS
Gretchen
Eva Lopez
(1993)
The
effect of group contact and curriculum on White, Asian American,
and African American students' attitudes.
Department
of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
ABSTRACT:
Since Brown v. Board of Education, social psychologists have
contributed to an understanding of intergroup relations in
education through studies of group contact and attitude change.
Contact has proven most successful in altering interpersonal
attitudes.
The present
study examines the effects of group contact on two types of
intergroup attitudes: awareness of ethnic inequality in society
and support for educational equity. It further considers the
effects of curriculum and in particular, courses that cover
issues of race and ethnicity, on these attitudes.
Students
completed surveys at the beginning and end of the first year
of college as part of a longitudinal project at The University
of Michigan. The surveys measured a variety of academic and
social experiences in addition to assessing intergroup attitudes.
Responses of students belonging to three ethnic groups--white,
Asian American, and African American--were examined.
Using
regression and path analyses, the relationship between group
contact, curriculum, and attitude change was tested while
controlling for attitudes at college entrance. These groups
of students differed in initial intergroup attitudes, and
in the extent and direction of attitude change over the first
year. Furthermore, the relationship of group contact and curriculum
to attitude change varied depending on ethnic group membership.
For white
students; outgroup contact with African American students
increased support for educational equity. However, curriculum
was an even stronger predictor of intergroup attitudes. Students
involved in coursework on intergroup relations increased their
awareness of inequality and support for educational equity.
For Asian
American students, group contact was important to intergroup
attitudes while curriculum showed little effect. Both outgroup
(with African Americans) and ingroup contact were associated
with stronger support for educational equity.
For African
American students, group contact did not change intergroup
attitudes. Curriculum, on the other hand, increased support
for educational equity in the first year. Thus, curriculum
in addition to group contact had an impact on intergroup attitudes.
The results
strongly suggest that the consequences of both are likely
to vary with ethnic group membership. The implications for
research on intergroup relations and education in a multiethnic
context are discussed.
|