Class Debates

For the in-class presentation/debate activities, a suggested plan is as follows. Each group should choose a leader. One team takes one side of the issue, and the other takes an opposing side. The team leaders first introduce the topic, and briefly give some history and background of the issue. The two debate teams then take turns presenting their sides of the issue, with both focusing on the research, theory, and logic that supports their side. After the two teams present their arguments, the team leaders offer a brief integrative summary, and provide comments about the future direction of the issue. To the extent that the debate is successful, it will stimulate questions and comments from among the teams, and the teams should be prepared to engage in the "q and a" portion of the presentation (teams should have a few questions of their own to help stimulate some class discussion).

The course readings will offer some material that can be used in the presentation and debate, but it would be highly desirable for the team to go beyond the course readings. Evaluation will be based on accuracy, thoroughness, clarity, and creativity, as well as on the extent to which the presentation and debate stimulate interest among your classmates. Participation and contribution to the team effort also will be evaluated. A written summary for each team (one per team, 2 to 4 typed double-spaced pages, 1 inch margins, 12 pt font) should provide a summary of the presentation, following the same format as the presentation.

 

Below are the criteria from which teams will be evaluated.

Strongly Strongly

Disagree Agree
  1. The group provided a clear history and/or understanding of relevance of issues.

1

2

3

4

5

2. The group members adequately supported their arguments with research, theory, logic, and experience.

1

2

3

4

5

3. The group’s presentation was cohesive and smooth in transition from point to point.

1

2

3

4

5

4. The group was able to address the opposing group’s arguments in a clear, logical manner.

1

2

3

4

5
  1. Each of the group’s members seemed to contribute to the debate/discussion.

1

2

3

4

5

6. The group members presented their information in an interesting and creative manner.

1

2

3

4

5

 

Comments:

 

In addition, each team will evaluate itself in terms of the contributions of individual members. Below is an example of the rating form.

 

Do not place your name on this evaluation sheet.

Please rate the extent to which your group members contributed to your group efforts and preparation. (Contribution includes meeting/email communication, research, and presentation).

 

Did not Contributed greatly

contribute much

John Jones

1

2

3

4

5

Amber Lee

1

2

3

4

5

Abby Anderson

1

2

3

4

5

Brian Smith

1

2

3

4

5