Manufacturing Handbook University of Michigan OM Professor R. Eugene Goodson |
|
|
|
Return to the handbook index.
SUBJECT: Preventive Maintenance (Production Systems) ALPHANUMERIC IDENTIFIER: BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Preventive maintenance programs involve many tasks and span across the corporation, however, companies must weight the costs against the benefits to determine the need for a PM program plan and implementation. KEYWORDS: Preventive Maintenance, Plant Maintenance, Facilities Maintenance, Asset Management, Predictive Maintenance OVERVIEW: The traditional preventive maintenance program integrates elements of the following:
Preventive maintenance managers are responsible for serving their internal customers and reducing the downtime and breakdown of production equipment. Many world class organizations have preventive maintenance personnel that handle everything from landscaping to scheduled maintenance of multi-million dollar assets in all parts of the company. Increasingly, preventive maintenance programs are collaborating with different parts of the traditional organization. Cross-functional teams consisting of engineering, machine and tool design, manufacturing, and purchasing now engage in an information exchange that focuses on the cause rather than the symptoms of operating problems. For example,
This shows how the new trend in preventive maintenance is to eventually eliminate the need for maintenance. Enhanced information exchange and scheduling are some of the current trends in preventive maintenance. Computerized maintenance management systems (CMMSs) enable management to schedule work orders, participate in electronic data interchange with suppliers, maximize human resources, and share data with other departments. Many organizations use preventive maintenance to reduce long run costs. One study by the Michigan Department of Transportation showed that a preventive maintenance program that was started in 1992 at a cost of $80 million has been a tremendous success. The study determined that had the DOT not implemented the strategy, it would have spent over $700 million in rehabilitative and reconstruction projects, nearly 9 times the cost of the original PM project. These types of cost savings are common with effective preventive maintenance programs, but companies must evaluate the mission-critical condition of production equipment and their tolerance for downtime and breakdowns. For example, newspaper companies are much less tolerant of breakdowns than air conditioning manufacturers. Managers must ask the following questions to determine whether a preventive maintenance program is feasible:
These questions and calculations will help management determine whether the PM program can add value to the operation, or whether the service should be outsourced in this age of down-sizing. REFERENCES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: This is a March 29, 1999 revision by Gene Goodson of an assignment for OM742 contributed by Manuel Valencia. |
|
|
Return to the handbook index.
Return to the tools page.
Return to the home page.
Copyright © 1999
R. E. Goodson
University of Michigan Business School