next up previous
Next: VAR 000100 Pre.Sample.23. 2000 Up: No Title Previous: VAR 000098 Pre.Sample.21. 2000

VAR 000099 Pre.Sample.22. 2000 CMSA

VAR 000099    Pre.Sample.22. 2000 CMSA
              MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
              COLUMNS:  224 - 225
              Numeric

   Pre-Sample.22.

       2000 CMSA - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix
       CENSUS DEFINITIONS.
       The six largest CMSA's are marked with **.
       NOTE: Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and
       segment identification, it could not be provided with segment
       level data, including this variable (blank).

       07. Boston-Lawrence-Salem MA-NH
       10. Buffalo-Niagara Falls NY
       14. Chicago-Gary-Lake County IL-IN-WI**
       28. Cleveland-Akron-Lorain OH
       31. Dallas-Ft Worth TX (Since Dallas and Ft Worth were
           made separate PMSAs in 1990, this new CMSA was added
       34. Denver-Boulder CO (Since Denver and Boulder were made
           separate PMSAs in 1990, this new CMSA was added in
       35. Detroit-Ann Arbor MI**
       42. Houston-Galveston-Brazoria TX
       49. Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside CA**
       56. Miami-Fort Lauderdale FL
       63. Milwaukee-Racine WI
       70. New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island NY-NJ-CT**
       77. Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton PA-NJ-DE-MD**
       78. Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PA
       84. San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose CA**
       91. Seattle-Tacoma WA

       96. Telephone sample (RDD)
       00. INAP, Location not in CMSA. This includes old code 32
           (Dayton Springfield, OH) which is no longer
           consolidated in 1990 since Dayton and Springfield are
           combined in a single MSA in 1990)

==============================


Walter Mebane
Mon Nov 19 01:35:33 EST 2001