next up previous
Next: VAR CF0406 NUMBER OF Up: nes48_00 Previous: VAR CF0404 SALIENCE DEMOCRATIC

VAR CF0405 NUMBER OF LIKES -REPUB HOUSE CANDIDATE

VAR CF0405    NUMBER OF LIKES -REPUB HOUSE CANDIDATE
              COLUMNS 392-392
              NUMERIC
              MD EQ 9


        Now I'd like to ask you about the good and bad points of the two
        (1996: the major) candidates for President.

        Is there anything in particular about <Republican presidential
        candidate> that might make you want to vote for him?  What is that?
        Anything else?

        SUMMARY:  NUMBER OF LIKES -- REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE
        -------------------------------------------------------------------

        USE WEIGHT VARIABLE VCF0009/VCF0009A/VCF0009B.

        Five possible mentions were coded in all original NES datasets.

        MD category 9 comprises cases of systematic question exclusion, i.e.,
        when a question was not present within a form (1972) or within a wave
        (1952,1960), or if a question was omitted entirely that year
        (1954,1958,1962, 1966,1970,1974,1978,1982,1986).

        Rs who responded "no" to "Is there anything in particular that you
        like about the Republican presidential candidate?" have been coded
        here as 0 mentions; Rs coded DK or NA in response to the same question
        have also been coded here as 0 mentions.  In addition, Rs who
        responded "yes" to "Is there anything in particular that you
        like about the Republican presidential candidate?" BUT who provided no
        mentions (DK or NA in first mention) have been coded 0 here.

        This variable refers to Eisenhower for 1952 and 1956, Nixon for 1960,
        1968 and 1972, Goldwater for 1964, Ford for 1976, Reagan for 1980 and
        1984, George Bush for 1988 and 1992, Dole for 1996, and George W. Bush
        for 2000.

        In 1996 and 2000, randomization occurred for the order in which the
        Presidential candidate names (2 major party candidates and Perot in ;
        1996; 2 major party candidates in 2000) were administered for the set
        of 'likes/dislikes' questions; note that for each candidate 'likes'
        preceded 'dislikes,' and both 'likes' and 'dislikes' questions were
        administered for one candidate before questions concerning the next
        candidate were begun.

               0.  Zero positive mentions (likes)
               1.  One positive mention (likes)
               2.  Two positive mentions (likes)
               3.  Three positive mentions (likes)
               4.  Four positive mentions (likes)
               5.  Five positive mentions (likes)

               9.  INAP, No pre IW (1952,1960); form II (1972); abbreviated IW
                   form (1980); question not used (1948 and non-presidential
                   years)

        1952:  29            1956:  21           1960:  26
        1964:  27            1968:  34           1972:  43
        1976:  3124-3128     1980:  78-82        1984:  82-86
        1988:  104-108       1992:  3110-3114    1996:  960218-960222
        2000:  000318-322


==============================


Walter Mebane 2003-02-17