Subject: RE: [netatalk-admins] official version of netatalk
From: Marc Matteo (MMatteo@sacbee.com)
Date: Mon Jan 04 1999 - 14:52:17 EST
No RedHat does *not* include netatalk, in any form.
There is an asun version in Red Hat's Contrib Net as well as a couple of
other RPM builds but none of those are "official" Red Hat.
Marc
> ----------
> From: Andrew McNabb
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 1999 11:25 AM
> To: Bill.McGonigle@Hitchcock.ORG
> Cc: Harry Zink; netatalk-admins@umich.edu
> Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] official version of netatalk
>
> I recently noticed that many linux distributions already include an asun
> netatalk package (Caldera, Redhat, & maybe others).
>
>
> On 4 Jan 1999, William P. McGonigle wrote:
>
> > I recently changed my Netatalk FAQ-O-Matic to indicate the asun version
> as
> > being of preference.
> >
> > The trick, of course, is getting the users to RTFM. There's a pointer
> to my
> > page in the kernel source, I think, but, that's not the audience we need
> to
> > reach.
> >
> > I noticed netatalk.org is registed but doesn't have www registered. I'd
> be
> > willing to virtual-host www as the FAQ-O-Matic if Wes wants it.
> >
> > -Bill
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> Andrew McNabb
> Argus Systems Group
> amcnabb@argus-systems.com
> ----------------------------------------------
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:16:07 EST