Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk and OPI
From: Kadinger Andras (bandit@freeside.elte.hu)
Date: Wed Jan 13 1999 - 21:06:14 EST
Ahh, welcome! :)
I was proposing this (and indeed doing some work as well) about a year
ago; I'm glad this surfaced again!
Please take a look at and comment on my current plans at
http://www.lettera.hu/~bandit/OPI/ ; some of these is already in place,
however I'm stuck at fixing papd to be completely binary transparent, as
well as fixing pap to finally work with the Harlequin RIPs we have around
here so that I can actually test what I write.
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Wagner One wrote:
> I haven't heard of any project like this (other than the commercial
> ones), but would be interested to hear of any (or any interest for that
> matter).
>
> Mike
>
> On 1/13/99 7:36 PM, Lee Blevins wrote:
>
> >Is there any interest in seeing netatalk perfom OPI?
[deletia]
> >To perform OPI on separated postscript files would be quite a task. It
> >would be considerably easier to do it to a composite postscript file and
> >this would cover a very wide range of printing conditions.
> >
> >Has this ever been tried? Could anyone be tempted to try it?
Hmm, I'm open to any cooperation as long as the product is going to be
free (and/or it gets me a job in Dallas for the next six months including
the working visa necessary to travel in from Hungary :) ).
Regards,
Andras Kadinger
bandit@freeside.elte.hu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:16:11 EST