Re: [netatalk-admins] netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.1.1/Solaris 2.5.1


Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.1.1/Solaris 2.5.1
From: Michael Mercier (mercma@uleth.ca)
Date: Wed Feb 17 1999 - 12:35:25 EST


Michael Han wrote:

>
> Hrmm, did you by any chance compile with PAM support enabled? It's
> defined in the toplevel Makefile. This is precisely the problem there
> used to (still does?) exist with Solaris PAM support. If I'd cared
> about -setpassword functionality, I'd've installed the latest *linux*
> PAM from sources.
>
> For the time being, try recompiling without PAM. Don't forget to make
> clean first, since changing only the Makefile won't allow you to make
> incrementally...
> --
> mikehan@best.com
> I will not spank others
> - The collected wisdom of Bart Simpson

I compiled the source without pam, tcpwrap, afs, kerberos, or des. I like
you don't care about the -setpassword function because we have a web based
password changing form that changes the users password on all our main
systems.

Mike




This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:16:19 EST