Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk problem, too many routes/iface? (more information)

Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk problem, too many routes/iface? (more information)
From: a sun (asun@saul2.u.washington.edu)
Date: Tue Jul 13 1999 - 14:09:04 EDT

• Next message: a sun: "Re: [netatalk-admins] ASIP works, Atalk doesn't"
• Previous message: Harry Zink/Netatalk List: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk problem, too many routes/iface? (more information)"
• In reply to: Harry Zink/Netatalk List: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk problem, too many routes/iface? (more information)"
• Next in thread: Patrik Schindler: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk problem, too many routes/iface? (more information)"
• Reply: a sun: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk problem, too many routes/iface? (more information)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   eth0 -seed -phase 2 ; this is the internal network
   eth1 -phase 2 ; this is the WAN/DSL connection

instead of the above, just stick the following in atalkd.conf and
atalkd will figure itself out:
eth0

-a

• Next message: a sun: "Re: [netatalk-admins] ASIP works, Atalk doesn't"
• Previous message: Harry Zink/Netatalk List: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk problem, too many routes/iface? (more information)"
• In reply to: Harry Zink/Netatalk List: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk problem, too many routes/iface? (more information)"
• Next in thread: Patrik Schindler: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk problem, too many routes/iface? (more information)"
• Reply: a sun: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk problem, too many routes/iface? (more information)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:16:57 EST