Re: NOT RFC1777 compliant

Craig R. Watkins (crw@INNOSOFT.COM)
Wed, 13 Dec 1995 21:47:00 -0500 (EST)

> Hmm...RFC 1777 seems ambiguous at best here to me, since X.500
> "associates" as many as two textual strings with most attribute types
> (a short one such as "o" is used many places, the longer
> "organizationName" is used others). The example in that paragraph would
> lead one to believe the interpretation you suggest, but it is just an
> example, and I think a case could be made the other way. Anyway, looks
> like it needs clarifying.

Well, Tim, it certainly seems to me that you are in a position to know
what the author intended!