Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] Netatalk and OPI
From: Sak Wathanasin (sw@nan.co.uk)
Date: Thu Jan 21 1999 - 19:39:14 EST
In reply to Hans-Guenter Weigand's message of the 21/01/99 at 21:24 +0100,
> hires files. "mypic.tiff" gets a little brother named "mypic.tiff.lay".
> This makes it easier to handle both image and XPress (or PageMaker)
> files in the same dir. If you separate the image files into different
> dirs you make it more difficult to archive finished and printed jobs. An
> average path looks like this in the ufs:
Why are you even bothering to archive the low-res? It's a) embedded in the
document (QXpress or Photoshop or whatever) b) can be regenerated from tyhe
hi-res by the sampler in a few secs anyway. Separate low-res/hi-res folders
make more sense to me. Besides, tagging on suffices is all very well, but you
run into the Mac's 31-char limit very quickly (and if it's on a Kanji system...)
Sak Wathanasin
Network Analysis Limited
178 Wainbody Ave South, Coventry CV3 6BX, UK
Internet: sw@nan.co.uk
Phone: (+44) 1203 419996 Fax: (+44) 1203 690690
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:16:13 EST