Re: [netatalk-admins] Samba/Unix File Management vs. Resource Forks?

Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] Samba/Unix File Management vs. Resource Forks?
From: Patrik Schindler (poc@pocnet.net)
Date: Thu Jul 15 1999 - 13:24:34 EDT

• Next message: Ron Chmara: "RE: [netatalk-admins] how to send messages to netatalk clients"
• Previous message: Erik Ohlin: "RE: [netatalk-admins] how to send messages to netatalk clients"
• In reply to: Clemens Anhuth: "[netatalk-admins] Samba/Unix File Management vs. Resource Forks?"
• Next in thread: Clemens Anhuth: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Samba/Unix File Management vs. Resource Forks?"
• Reply: Patrik Schindler: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Samba/Unix File Management vs. Resource Forks?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 14:29 Uhr +0200 15.07.1999, Clemens Anhuth wrote:

>is this correct so far?

Yes.

>if it is...what are the thoughts on using samba plus netatalk for
>offering access to the same filebase?

I do neither exactly know what the "netatalk-support" for samba really does nor what to do against you described problem except to look manually to avoid it.

:wq! PoC

• Next message: Ron Chmara: "RE: [netatalk-admins] how to send messages to netatalk clients"
• Previous message: Erik Ohlin: "RE: [netatalk-admins] how to send messages to netatalk clients"
• In reply to: Clemens Anhuth: "[netatalk-admins] Samba/Unix File Management vs. Resource Forks?"
• Next in thread: Clemens Anhuth: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Samba/Unix File Management vs. Resource Forks?"
• Reply: Patrik Schindler: "Re: [netatalk-admins] Samba/Unix File Management vs. Resource Forks?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:16:58 EST