Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] Samba/Unix File Management vs. Resource Forks?
From: Clemens Anhuth (clemens.anhuth@snap.de)
Date: Sat Jul 17 1999 - 08:01:45 EDT
> The issue of Win95/98 or NT clients moving NT SFM (Services for
> Macintosh)
> and losing the resource fork is related to NTFS vs. FAT
> volumes.
it does also happen when copying files to a different name in the
same directory using win95 via windows explorer over network as
well.
so it is not only related to the udnerstandable issue of being
unable to store the forks in fat16.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:16:58 EST