Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] Samba/Unix File Management vs. Resource Forks?
From: Matthew Keller (kellermg@potsdam.edu)
Date: Sun Jul 18 1999 - 12:27:00 EDT
Clemens Anhuth wrote:
>
> > The issue of Win95/98 or NT clients moving NT SFM (Services for
> > Macintosh)
> > and losing the resource fork is related to NTFS vs. FAT
> > volumes.
>
> it does also happen when copying files to a different name in the
> same directory using win95 via windows explorer over network as
> well.
>
> so it is not only related to the udnerstandable issue of being
> unable to store the forks in fat16.
This problem does not occur if the '--with-netatalk' switch is used
when configuring Samba.
--- Matthew Keller - Lead Programmer/Analyst Distributed Computing and Telemedia State University of New York at Potsdam
Web: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/ PGP: http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/crypto/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:16:58 EST