Re: [netatalk-admins] Valid shell needed for users?


Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] Valid shell needed for users?
From: Sam Noble (sam@shadow.org)
Date: Wed Sep 01 1999 - 12:18:46 EDT


    I believe this is a feature of PAM rather than netatalk.

/* Sam */
----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Holling <myke@ees.com>
To: Rich Lafferty <rich@alcor.concordia.ca>
Cc: <netatalk-admins@umich.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 1999 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] Valid shell needed for users?

> > Usual Behavior. Your ftp daemon probably works the same way. Make
> > their shell something like /bin/false and add /bin/false to /etc/shells
> > and you're all set.
>
> Actually I tried that...I also did a quick grep of the afpd binary for
> "/etc/shells" and came up blank. At this point I'm looking for
> documentation of this feature, since the man page says nothing about it.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:17:11 EST