Subject: [netatalk-admins] Samba
From: Jon Doyle (Jon@document-solutions.com)
Date: Fri Nov 19 1999 - 12:24:36 EST
Thanks everyone,
Jonathan wrote the same this morning and I was able to put one more NT
Server to rest! A great way to finish the week!!! I see one difference in
Hauke's suggestion : delete veto files = Yes Should this be added to the
smb.conf file? Meaning should these files be deleted?
Andrew, I did not have the hide files in the original smb.conf. Not sure
why, perhaps due to using SuSE 6.2 distribution? I did notice that those
that have the Show All (like myself) on NT workstations could still see
these files, but the Win98 boxes all have the option to hide "know" files
extensions and hidden files. THe veto option looks like it works best. I do
not care about these files as long as everything is seen at the Server.
Regards,
Jon
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:17:27 EST