Subject: Re: [netatalk-admins] Building Netatalk for SunOS 5.6 sparc Ultra-Enterprise
From: Vicki Brown (vlb@cfcl.com)
Date: Tue Jan 19 1999 - 15:01:17 EST
At 17:07 -0800 1/15/99, Bob Krzaczek wrote:
> at_sun.c? That's odd, since that file appears in the SunOS 4 hierarchy. In
> your subject line, you mention SunOS 5. Something's wrong there... ;-)
Apparently what's wrong is that netatalk1.3.3 doesn't support Solaris /
SunOS 5.6. Moving on to 1.4b2 (I make it a point to avoid betas unless I'm
just playing... or I know there is something about the "last stable version
pre-beta" that doesn't work)
I made the (bad) assumption that when the README said "runs on SunOS 4.1+",
that included 5.* (that is, the bad assumption that the + meant "and
higher" not "only versions with a 4 in them".)
>
> Check the top level makefile. It runs `uname -rs` to work out what kind of
Worse. 1.3.3 only ran uname, not uname -rs
> machine you're own. It then cd's to sys/${ARCH}, where ${ARCH} is set
> based on the output of uname.
and in 1.3.3, the only choice was "sun".
>
> I'd probably start poking there.
Thanks!
The compiler, of course, wasn't the problem (the compiler is rarely the
problem when the include files can't be found ;-). The problem was the
release of netatalk.
- Vicki
---
|\ _,,,---,,_ Vicki Brown <vlb@cfcl.com>
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Journeyman Sourceror: Scripts & Philtres
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' P.O. Box 1269 San Bruno CA 94066
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) http://www.cfcl.com/~vlb www.ptf.com/macperl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 18 1999 - 16:16:12 EST